Electric potential of point charge

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at a point due to a fixed charged particle, given a second particle's charge and kinetic energy. The user attempts to apply conservation of energy but initially misinterprets the potential and kinetic energy values as both being zero. They realize that only kinetic energy must be positive and adjust their approach to find the charge of the fixed particle using the formula for electric potential. The final expressions derived include the charge of the fixed particle and the electric potential, indicating a clearer understanding of the concepts involved. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying energy conservation principles in electrostatics.
pyninja
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charged particle is fixed in place at the origin. A second particle of charge +10^{-6} C is released from rest from very far away (\approx (\infty, 0)). The second particle passes the point (9 m, 0) with a kinetic energy of 1.0 J.

Find the electric potential due to the fixed charged particle at the point (9 m, 0).

Homework Equations


F = \frac{q_1q_2}{r^2} = ma
V = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q_1}{r}


The Attempt at a Solution


We need to the find the charge of the fixed particle to apply the formula for V... I tried using conservation of energy, but it seems to me that the initial potential energy and kinetic energy are both 0. Not sure what I'm doing wrong there...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok why don't you use foruma U= Q*delta V if as you say the total energy is zero then U2 = -K2
 
madah12 said:
ok why don't you use foruma U= Q*delta V if as you say the total energy is zero then U2 = -K2

Oh, for some reason I thought the energy has to be positive, haha.

So then I get q_1 = -\frac{k r}{q_2}.

And V = -\frac{k^2}{q_2}?

(where k = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0})

Thanks for your help!
 
Only kinetic energy has to be positive.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
970
Replies
2
Views
636