Electric potential: point charge in a hollow charged conductor

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential inside a hollow charged conductor with a point charge at its center. The electric field is defined for different regions: outside the conductor, inside the conductor, and within the cavity. The potential for regions outside and between the conductor's layers is established, but confusion arises regarding the potential within the cavity. The key takeaway is that the potential inside the cavity must account for contributions from all relevant regions, particularly noting that the electric field is zero within the conductor itself. Correctly integrating the electric field across these regions is essential for determining the potential function accurately.
misa
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
[solved] electric potential: point charge in a hollow charged conductor

Homework Statement


A hollow spherical conductor, carrying a net charge +Q, has inner radius r1 and outer radius r2 = 2r1. At the center of the sphere is a point charge +Q/2.

GIANCOLIch23p22.jpg




d) Determine the potential as a function of r for 0 < r < r1.

Homework Equations



(π = pi)
For r > r2, the electric field is (3Q)/(8πε0r2).
For r1 < r < r2, the electric field is 0 (ie, field inside conductor is zero in static situations).
For 0 < r < r1, the electric field is Q/(8πε0r2).


The potential as a function of r for r > r2 (where voltage is taken to be 0 when r is infinite) is (3Q)/(8πε0r).

The potential as a function of r for r1 < r < r2 is (3Q)/(16πε0r1).


The Attempt at a Solution



My first instinct was to add the potential (3Q)/(16πε0r1) to Q/(8πε0r), which is the potential from infinity to r if the shell wasn't present. However, the answer is wrong. I also made many other fruitless attempts at this problem, but none of them very logical.

Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong, and how to find this potential when r is within the cavity of the conductor?

I would greatly appreciate your help with this problem (and thank you in advance)!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When in doubt, go back to the definition of the potential at a point \vec{r}:

V(\vec{r})=-\int_{\infty}^{\vec{r}}\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dl}

The electric field has different values in different regions, so you break the integral into pieces:

V(\vec{r})=-\int_{\infty}^{\vec{r}}\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dl}=-\int_{\infty}^{r_2}\vec{E}_{\text{outside}}\cdot\vec{dl}+-\int_{r_2}^{r_1}\vec{E}_{\text{between}}\cdot\vec{dl}+-\int_{r_1}^{\vec{r}}\vec{E}_{\text{inside}}\cdot\vec{dl}
 
So are you saying that I should add all three potentials like this?
ie, (3Q)/(16πε0r1) + [Q/(8πε0)](1/r - 1/r1)

-I realize I derived the potential from r to r1 incorrectly.

-Also, I didn't include the potential in the region from r2 to infinity when I first solved the problem because I thought that (3Q)/(16πε0r1) basically came from the total potential from infinity to r1 (ie, potential is constant in that region aka the integral representing the change in potential is zero, so potential anywhere in r2 to r1 is just the potential as we approach r2). Am I right in assuming this or do I need to add (3Q)/(16πε0r) to the sum of the integrals too?
 
Well, what does the middle integral actually add to the potential inside r<r1 ?
 
No, it doesn't add to the integral because E is 0 in that region.

Okay, thank you for your help. :)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K