Electromagnetic induction (Faraday's law)

  • #1
Meow12
45
20
Homework Statement
A wire is bent to contain a semi-circular curve of radius 0.25m. It is rotated at 120rev/min as shown into a uniform magnetic field below the wire of 1.30T. What is the maximum emf induced between the left and right sides of the wire in V?
Relevant Equations
##\phi=\omega t##
##\Phi_B=BA\cos\phi##
##\displaystyle\epsilon=\oint\vec E\cdot d\vec{l}=-\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}##
physics.png

I used the formulas above and got the right answer:

##\phi=4\pi t##
##\Phi_B=0.128\cos 4\pi t##
##\epsilon=1.61\sin 4\pi t##
##\epsilon_\text{max}=1.61\ V##

But I still have a question: Faraday's law requires a closed loop, whereas the semi-circular loop I used was open on one side.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Underlying phenomenon for Faraday's law is the Lorentz force. The steps from there to Faraday's law and to your exercise answer are the same.

##\ ##
 
  • #3
Where did you get the expression that you used? Under what conditions is it applicable? Just because it gives the "right answer" does not justify its use. For example, when the semicircle is in the orientation shown in the figure, the flux through the semicircle is zero. furthermore, it is zero not instantaneously as your expression predicts, but half the time needed for a complete revolution while the semicircle is outside the field.

If you want to apply Faraday's law, do it right. Consider a closed loop as shown below and use the definition of magnetic flux, $$\displaystyle\epsilon=\oint\vec E\cdot d\vec{l}
=-\frac{d}{dt}\left(\mathbf{B}\cdot \mathbf{\hat n}~da\right).$$ Since the magnetic field is constant and uniform, the only time dependence is in the normal to the loop ##\mathbf{\hat n}## so you have to find an expression for ##\dfrac{d \mathbf{\hat n}}{dt}## and take the dot product.

Alternatively, you can consider this to be a motional emf problem and find the potential difference between the two ends of the semicircle.
Loop_in_Field.png
 
  • Like
Likes Meow12
  • #4
I am not quite sure about @kuruman suggestion of the closed loop. I would choose as closed loop the semicircle together with the diameter. Then as @kuruman suggest i would view it as a motional EMF problem and compute the motional EMF as the line integral $$EMF=\int_C (\vec{B}\times\vec{v})\cdot \vec{dl}$$ where the curve of integration ##C## is the aforementioned closed loop. It is easy to see that ##\vec{B}\times\vec{v}=0## for the points of the closed loop that lie on the diameter because ##v=0## there.

You might tell me that there is no conducting path in the diameter but even if there was, the EMF would be the same for the whole closed loop, the only difference in physics is that we would have current circulating in that hypothetical closed loop.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Meow12
  • #5
Delta2 said:
I am not quite sure about @kuruman suggestion of the closed loop. I would choose as closed loop the semicircle together with the diameter.
We are saying the same thing. If you consider the formal integral over the entire circle, only the semicircle that has field lines going through it contributes non-zero terms while the other half contributes a bunch of zeroes. So one gets the same answer as using the semicircle that you suggest.
 
  • #6
kuruman said:
We are saying the same thing. If you consider the formal integral over the entire circle, only the semicircle that has field lines going through it contributes non-zero terms while the other half contributes a bunch of zeroes. So one gets the same answer as using the semicircle that you suggest.
Ehm this isnt so clear to me, with your choice of closed loop, the way i see it, we have EMF during the whole rotation time (full cycle) (during half cycle the one half semicircle contributes non zero, during the next half cycle the other half semicircle contributes non zero), while with my choice we have EMF only during half cycle.
 
  • #7
You are right. I don't know what I was thinking.
 
  • Care
Likes Delta2
  • #8
Actually, there is no reason to consider a closed loop enclosing an area for a formal application of Faraday's law or using motional emf. We are looking for the maximum emf. Since ##\text{emf}=-\dfrac{d\Phi_M}{dt},## all one has to do is find an expression for ##\Phi_M(t)## and maximize its time derivative.
 

FAQ: Electromagnetic induction (Faraday's law)

What is electromagnetic induction?

Electromagnetic induction is the process by which a changing magnetic field within a closed loop of wire induces an electromotive force (EMF) or voltage in the wire. This phenomenon is described by Faraday's law of induction.

What is Faraday's law of induction?

Faraday's law of induction states that the induced EMF in any closed circuit is equal to the negative rate of change of the magnetic flux through the circuit. Mathematically, it is expressed as EMF = -dΦ/dt, where Φ is the magnetic flux.

How does Lenz's law relate to electromagnetic induction?

Lenz's law is a principle that states the direction of the induced current will be such that it opposes the change in magnetic flux that caused it. This law is a consequence of the conservation of energy and is incorporated into Faraday's law with the negative sign.

What are some practical applications of electromagnetic induction?

Electromagnetic induction has numerous practical applications, including the generation of electricity in power plants, the operation of transformers, induction cooktops, electric guitars, and various types of sensors and induction motors.

What factors affect the magnitude of the induced EMF?

The magnitude of the induced EMF depends on several factors: the rate of change of the magnetic flux, the number of turns in the coil, the cross-sectional area of the coil, and the strength of the magnetic field. Faster changes, more turns, larger areas, and stronger magnetic fields all result in a greater induced EMF.

Similar threads

Back
Top