Electron Bands in 2D Semiconductor

  • Thread starter Thread starter StochasticHarmonic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Electron
StochasticHarmonic
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The given energy dispersion is:
\begin{equation}
E(p) =
\begin{cases}
-p^2/2m_v & \text{if } E \leq 0 \\
p^2/2m_c+\Delta & \text{if } E > 0
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
Where ##m_c## and ##m_v## are the effective masses of the conduction and valence band electrons.

Part A begins with derivation of the energy dependent DOS, which is fairly simple to find using the 2D density of states relation:
\begin{equation}
\frac{2}{\pi^2 \hbar} \frac{d^2 p}{dE} = D(E)
\end{equation}
to be:
\begin{equation}
D(E)=\{\begin{array}{cc}\frac{m_v}{\pi \hbar^2 },&\mbox{ if } E\leq 0\\ \frac{m_c}{\pi \hbar^2 }, & \mbox{ if } E>\Delta\end{array}
\end{equation}
Then for part b we use the fact that the total number of electrons are fixed:

\begin{equation}
\int_{E_F}^{\infty} f(E)D(E) \, dE = \int^{E_F}_{-\infty} (1-f(E))D(E) \, dE
\end{equation}
To derive the equation:
\begin{equation}
-\beta m_c E_D+m_c ln[1+e^{-\beta(\mu-\Delta)}]=m_vln[1+e^{- \beta \mu}]
\end{equation}
Which gives us a relation for our chemical potential.

My Question comes from the following qualitative question: Assume the semiconductor is intrinsic, where ##E_D=0##, or the valence band is filled and conduction band empty at T=0, How does the chemical potential change with increasing temperature for ##m_c>m_v##?
Relevant Equations
When ##E_D=0##, equation 5 becomes:

\begin{equation}
m_c ln[1+e^{-\beta(\mu-\Delta)}]=m_vln[1+e^{- \beta \mu}]
\end{equation}
Question is stated below:
In the questions solution, they conceptually discuss how the DOS for the conduction band becomes larger when ##m_c## is larger than ##m_v##. This then implies that there is "more phase space for electrons than holes", which confuses me. How can you make a statement about the phase space of electrons based only on the conduction band DOS being larger than the valence band DOS?

They go on to make another few statements which confuse me; "at finite temperature the holes must spread wider in energy compared to electrons. This means that with increasing temperature, the half-filled state must shift down in energy so the Boltzmann Tail of the distribution |E-mu|>>T has larger overlap with the valence band."

If anyone could provide some clarity on this conceptually, that would be extremely beneficial. I'm confused on how the conduction band DOS is proportional to the phase space of the electrons, and I'm also confused on what the half filled state is, and also why the holes energy spreads out with finite temperature.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top