Electron bound to proton by gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of the radius of an electron bound to a proton by gravity, with one participant advocating for equating gravitational and centripetal forces, resulting in a radius of 1.04 x 10^-7 m. They express confusion over why others set Coulomb and gravitational forces equal, suggesting that this approach leads to different conclusions. Another participant clarifies that in a hydrogen atom, the gravitational force is negligible compared to the electric force, and emphasizes that the correct method involves ensuring the electron's angular momentum meets specific criteria. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing between centripetal and centrifugal forces in these calculations. Ultimately, the participants converge on the need for accurate calculations and understanding of the forces at play in atomic structures.
Juli
Messages
24
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Suppose an electron were bound to a proton not by the electrical force, but by gravity. What would be the radius and energy of Bohr's first orbit?
Relevant Equations
##F_G = \frac{G\cdot m_1 m_2}{r^2}##
##F_C = m_e r \omega^2##
Hello everyone,
I have the problem above. I chose to put ##F_G = F_Z## to solve it and end up with a radius ##r = 1.04\cdot 10^{-7}##m.
Solutions on the internet choose to put the gravitational force equal to the centrifugal force and obviously end up with a completely different solution. I can kind of understand both ways, but for me my way is the solution to the above statement, and to put ##F_G## equal to the coulomb force would just show how big the radius has to be to equal the Coulomb force. Which of course is valid because this is how the electron is bound to the proton. But in the problem we think about, how it is, when the Coulomb force is not there.
Which way would you think is correct to solve what is asked?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think the gravitational force between the proton and electron has to equal the electrical force?

In a normal hydrogen atom, the sum  of the gravitational and electrical forces between the proton and electron provides the centripetal force on the electron. You can neglect the gravitational force as it is  much  weaker than the electric force.

But if there is no electric force, the centripetal force on the electron has to be provided entirely by the gravitational force.

Does that make sense?
 
Hello, thank you for your answer. I was just about to delete this post, since I got the right solution by using my method. I was wondering anyway, that if the Coulomb force was set equal to the centrifugal force and the gravitational force was set equal to the centrifugal force, that the Coulomb and the gravitational force had to be equal. And that is what I got now. I think I made som e major mistakes in the way I calculated my first solutions.
 
Juli said:
I was just about to delete this post, since I got the right solution by using my method.
What answers (radius and energy) did you get? Hopefully the radius was very (and I mean very!) large.

Juli said:
I was wondering anyway, that if the Coulomb force was set equal to the centrifugal force and the gravitational force was set equal to the centrifugal force, that the Coulomb and the gravitational force had to be equal. And that is what I got now. I think I made som e major mistakes in the way I calculated my first solutions.
You mean centripetal, not centrifugal.

You shouldn't set the Coulomb and gravitational forces equal here; it's wrong. The 1st Bohr orbit is determined by ensuring that the electron's angular momentum is the required value.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top