- #1
jameson2
- 53
- 0
I've a few questions about an EPR experiment I did recently. It involved setting up a Helmholtz pair, placing a sample in a uniform field inside the pair, and observing results on an oscilloscope.
- You can calculate the field at the centre of a Helmholtz pair using the formula for one Helmholtz coil twice. This formula is: [tex]B=\frac{\mu_0 N I r^2}{2(x^2 +r^2)^{(3/2)}} [/tex] This let's you get a value for the B/I ratio, which can be compared to an experimental value. I was wondering what would cause the two values to differ? Could it be that the coil has an actual thickness, rather than being infinitely thin as the derivation seems to assume? Or are there other factors?
- At one point I had to have both a DC and AC component of the magnetic field (by having both an direct and alternating voltage). I was wondering about the AC field: since the experiment is looking at Zeeman splitting of energy levels, is the AC field meant to continually flip the electrons' spins, so that they are constantly making transitions between their two energy levels? (Therefore, being able to see a continuous up-and-down signal on the oscilloscope?)
- Related to the last one: The voltage across the Helmholtz pair oscillates. So am I right in thinking that once every cycle of this voltage, the electrons will have their spin flipped over and back again, and hence you'll see two peaks on the oscilloscope for every cycle of voltage?
- I had to measure the FWHH of the signal. This comes out in seconds. However I'm meant to give it in units of magnetic field. I'm really unsure about this part. I'm thinking I might use the formula [tex] h\nu=g \mu_B B [/tex], since I can get seconds in there by inverting the frequency (nu). It doesn't seem like a great answer though. I'd really like to know why it is useful to have it in this form, as well as how to do it.
- What factors can affect the FWHH? Really no idea about this one...