MHB Elementary Number Theory proof

AI Thread Summary
To prove that if \( k \) divides integers \( a \) and \( b \), then \( k \) divides \( as + bt \) for any integers \( s \) and \( t \), start by expressing \( a \) and \( b \) as \( a = km \) and \( b = kn \) for some integers \( m \) and \( n \). Substituting these into the expression \( as + bt \) gives \( (km)s + (kn)t = k(ms + nt) \). Since \( ms + nt \) is an integer, it follows that \( k \) divides \( as + bt \). This confirms the proof is valid, and the approach should focus on the generality of \( s \) and \( t \) rather than specific values.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

Here is the question:

"Prove that if $k$ divides the integers $a$ and $b$, then $k$ divides $as+bt$ for every pair of integers $s$ and $t$ for every pair of integers."

The attempted work:

Suppose $k$ divides $a$ and $k$ divides $b$, where $a,b\in\mathbb{Z}$. Then, $a=kt$ and $b=ks$, where $s,t\in\mathbb{Z}$ (Here is where I am stuck).

Do I solve for $k$?

If I do solve for $k$, then it yields the
$k=\frac{a}{t}$. Then, $b=\frac{as}{t}$. So $bt-as=0$. Then $0$ divides $bt-as$.

So is it right to the proof this way?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cbarker1 said:
Dear Everyone,

Here is the question:

"Prove that if $k$ divides the integers $a$ and $b$, then $k$ divides $as+bt$ for every pair of integers $s$ and $t$ for every pair of integers."

The attempted work:

Suppose $k$ divides $a$ and $k$ divides $b$, where $a,b\in\mathbb{Z}$. Then, $a=kt$ and $b=ks$, where $s,t\in\mathbb{Z}$ (Here is where I am stuck).

Do I solve for $k$?

If I do solve for $k$, then it yields the
$k=\frac{a}{t}$. Then, $b=\frac{as}{t}$. So $bt-as=0$. Then $0$ divides $bt-as$.

So is it right to the proof this way?
Hi Cbarker1,

$s$ and $t$ are arbitrary integers in the question, you should not use them as you do in the proof, where they are fixed integers that depend on $a$, $b$, and $k$.

You can say that there are integers $m$ and $n$ such that $a=km$ and $b=kn$. Now, you have:
$$
as+bt = (km)s + (kn)t = k(ms+nt)
$$
As $ms+nt$ is an integer, this shows that $k$ divides $as+bt$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top