MHB Elements of $\mathbb{F}_{2^2}: What Are They?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements
Click For Summary
The elements of the finite field $\mathbb{F}_{2^2}$ are confirmed to be 0, 1, a, and a^{-1}, where a and b are non-zero elements satisfying the condition that their product is 1, thus establishing that b is the multiplicative inverse of a. The discussion emphasizes that the product of any two elements in the field cannot be 0, a, or b, as this would contradict the properties of an integral domain. Additionally, there is a query about demonstrating the isomorphism between $\mathbb{F}_{2^2}$ and $\mathbb{Z}_2(a)$, specifically whether it is necessary to show that both fields contain the same elements. The conversation highlights the fundamental structure and properties of the field $\mathbb{F}_{2^2}$. Understanding these elements and their relationships is crucial for further exploration of field theory.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hello! :o

Which are the elements of $\mathbb{F}_{2^2}$ ?? (Wondering)

There are $4$ elements, right??

For each element $a$ in $\mathbb{F}_{2^2}$ it stands that $a^2=a \Rightarrow a^2 \in \mathbb{F}_{2^2}$, right??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The elements are the following:

$$0,1,a,b$$

The product of two elements is in the field, so $$a \cdot b=0 \text{ or } 1 \text{ or } a \text{ or } b$$

It cannot be $0$ because $\mathbb{F}_{2^2}$ is an integral domain and since $a , b \neq 0$ the product cannot be $0$.

The product cannot ba $a$ or $b$, because then one of $a$ and $b$ must be $1$, and then the field would contain only $3$ elements.

Therefore, the product must be $1$, that means that $a \cdot b=1 \Rightarrow
b=a^{-1}$.

So, the elements are $$0,1,a,a^{-1}$$ right?? (Wondering)

Also, how could we show that $$\mathbb{F}_{2^2} \cong \mathbb{Z}_2(a)$$ where $a$ is of degree $2$ over $\mathbb{Z}_2$?? (Wondering)

Do we have to show that these two fields have the same elements?? (Wondering)
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
841
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
863
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K