- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
In Alaca and Williams' (A&W) book: Introductory Algebraic Number Theory , Theorem 1.2.1 reads as follows:View attachment 3456Without any earlier definition or clarification, A&W refer to \(\displaystyle a/p\) and \(\displaystyle b/p\) (see text above) ... BUT ... how should we regard such elements? What exactly do they mean and how do we know they exist?
That is, is \(\displaystyle a/p\) simply shorthand for an element \(\displaystyle x\) where \(\displaystyle a = px\)?
Further, presumably using the notation \(\displaystyle a/p\) implies that \(\displaystyle p^{-1}\) exists ... BUT what if it does not exist?
Hope someone can clarify these apparently simple matters ...
Peter
That is, is \(\displaystyle a/p\) simply shorthand for an element \(\displaystyle x\) where \(\displaystyle a = px\)?
Further, presumably using the notation \(\displaystyle a/p\) implies that \(\displaystyle p^{-1}\) exists ... BUT what if it does not exist?
Hope someone can clarify these apparently simple matters ...
Peter