MHB Elizabeth's question at Yahoo Answers regarding the computation of work

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computation Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to empty water from a cylindrical tank in two scenarios: the top half and the bottom half. The work is derived using calculus, specifically through integration of the force needed to lift water slices against gravity. For the top half, the work calculated is 1,411,200π J, while for the bottom half, it is double that amount at 2,822,400π J. The interpretation of the work done relates to the area of a trapezoid formed by the linear function of the integrand. Overall, the calculations demonstrate how the height from which water is lifted significantly affects the total work required.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus help upper and lower half?

A cylinder with height 8 m and radius 3 m is filled with water and must be emptied through an outlet pipe 2 m above the top of the cylinder.

(A) compute the work required to empty the water in the top half of the tank
(B) compute the work required to empty the equal amount of water in the lower half of the tank
(C) interpret

Please show any steps you used. Thanks!

Here is a link to the question:

Calculus help upper and lower half? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Elizabeth,

I prefer to work problems in general terms, and derive a formula we may then plug our data into. Let's let the radius of the cylindrical tank be $r$, the height of the tank be $h$ and the additional distance above the tank the fluid must be pumped be $q$. All measures are in meters.

Let's then imagine the surface of the fluid is initially a distance $h_1$ from the top of the tank, and we wish to pump out fluid until the surface is a distance $h_2$ from the top of the tank. We will let $W$ be the amount of work required to accomplish this task.

We will use a vertical $y$-axis along which to integrate. Now, if we imagine slicing the cylinder of water we wish to remove into disks, we may state, using work is force times distance for a constant force:

$$dW=Fd=mgd$$

The force exerted is equal to the weight of the slice, which is the product of the mass and the acceleration due to gravity.

The mass $m$ of the slice is the product of the mass density $\rho$ (in $$\frac{\text{kg}}{\text{m}^3}$$) and the volume $$V=\pi r^2\,dy$$ of the slice, i.e.:

$m=\rho\pi r^2\,dy$

The distance the slice must be vertically moved against gravity is:

$d=q+y$

Putting it all together, we have:

$$dW=\rho\pi g r^2(q+y)\,dy$$

Now, to find the total work done, we may sum the work differentials through integration:

$$W=\rho\pi g r^2\int_{h_1}^{h_2}(q+y)\,dy$$

Applying the anti-derivative form of the FTOC, we find:

$$W=\rho\pi g r^2\left[qy+\frac{1}{2}y^2 \right]_{h_1}^{h_2}$$

$$W=\rho\pi g r^2\left(\left(qh_2+\frac{1}{2}h_2^2 \right)-\left(qh_1+\frac{1}{2}h_1^2 \right) \right)$$

$$W=\rho\pi g r^2\left(q(h_2-h_1)+\frac{1}{2}(h_2^2-h_1^2) \right)$$

$$W=\rho\pi g r^2(h_2-h_1)\left(q+\frac{1}{2}(h_2+h_1) \right)$$

$$W=\frac{1}{2}\rho\pi g r^2(h_2-h_1)\left(h_1+h_2+2q \right)$$

Now we may plug in the given/known data

Water is generally taken to have a mass density of:

$$\rho=1000\,\frac{\text{kg}}{\text{m}^3}$$

I will assume we are to use:

$$g=9.8\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s^2}}$$

We are given:

$r=3\text{ m},\,q=2\text{ m},\,h=8\text{ m}$

For part (A), we have:

$$h_1=0\text{ m},\,h_2=\frac{h}{2}=4\text{ m}$$

Hence:

$$W_A=1411200\pi\text{ J}$$

For part (B), we have:

$$h_1=\frac{h}{2}\,\text{m}=4\text{ m},\,h_2=h=8\text{ m}$$

Hence:

$$W_B=2822400\pi\text{ J}=2W_A$$

(C) If we interpret the amount of work done as the area of a trapezoid, since the integrand is a linear function, we find that:

$$W_A=k\cdot\frac{1}{2}(6+2)4=16k$$

$$W_B=k\cdot\frac{1}{2}(10+6)4=32k=2W_A$$
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top