I Energies of bound state for delta function potential

ErwinZumer
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Hi
Let's consider a potential of the form
1695146975780.png

The Schrodinger equation reads
1695147036236.png

as shown in the book 'Introduction to Quantum mechanis' by D.J. Griffiths, Chaper 2 Section 5, the solution of the equation yields (only for bound state, which means E<0):
1695147197115.png

My question:
if i have one particle and i apply this potential on it, how does it take one value of energy?
another question is, if i have one paricle with some energy, E, before applying this potential, does the energy of the particle will change?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ErwinZumer said:
Hi
Let's consider a potential of the form
View attachment 332220
The Schrodinger equation reads
View attachment 332222
as shown in the book 'Introduction to Quantum mechanis' by D.J. Griffiths, Chaper 2 Section 5, the solution of the equation yields (only for bound state, which means E<0):
View attachment 332223
My question:
if i have one particle and i apply this potential on it, how does it take one value of energy?
another question is, if i have one paricle with some energy, E, before applying this potential, does the energy of the particle will change?
There are parallels, of course with the hydrogen atom, where an electron may settle into a bound state around the nucleus by emitting a photon that carries away the excess energy. Does this happen for the delta function potential? Good question.

The physical significance of the delta potential is probably in the scattering states and the transmission and reflection coefficients.

There's more here to get you started if you want to investigate further:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_potential
 
That delta function potential is like the limit of a finite square well, ##V(x) = -V_0## when ##|x|<L/2## and ##V(x) = 0## when ##|x|\geq L/2##, if you start making it more narrow by decreasing ##L## and increasing ##V_0## at the same time so that the product ##V_0 L## stays at constant value ##\alpha##.

It's probably difficult to explain in a pictorial way why this system has exactly one bound state in the limit where ##L## is very close to ##0## and ##V_0## is a very large number.

A more difficult problem would be to find out how much more quickly you would have to increase well depth ##V_0## compared to the rate of ##L## decrease so that after some minimum value of ##V_0## it would have exactly two bound states. But it's impossible to define a generalized function similar to ##\delta (x)## that would describe the high-##V_0## limit of this situation.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top