Energy becoming mass? Wilczek question

  • Thread starter Quantum_Grid
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Energy Mass
In summary, F. Wilczek's book "The Lightness of Being" discusses his theory on the origin of mass, specifically the effect of color charge carried by quarks and how it is nullified by an antiquark of opposite charge nearby. However, there is still some residual energy left over, which can be calculated using the equation m=E/c2 to find the mass of a proton. According to special relativity, mass and energy are essentially the same thing, with the conversion factor of c2 being used in SI units. Popular science books may not be the best resource for learning physics.
  • #1
Quantum_Grid
63
0
In F. Wilczeks book, The Lightness of Being he describes his theory on the origin of mass. He explains, in much more detail, about how color charge carried by quarks disturbs gluon fields which increase with the distance from the quark. Then he explains that this energy cost is nullified by an antiquark of the opposite charge nearby. This doesn't cancel it completely because of some [pesky!] Rules of Quantum Mechanics. He says, basically, that there is some residual energy left over after this "canceling-out" and using the equation m=E/c2, we find the mass of a proton.

I'm sure I missed something; all I see he did was explain where some excess energy has come from, when/where does that energy become mass?

I hope I explained everything clearly enough to make sense!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Quantum_Grid said:
...I'm sure I missed something; all I see he did was explain where some excess energy has come from, when/where does that energy become mass?...

According to special relativity, mass and energy are pretty much the "same thing". You may have seen [tex]E=mc^2[/tex]; [tex]c^2[/tex] is just a unit conversion factor that can be set to 1 to give [tex]E=m[/tex].
 
  • #3
we had a discussion about mass <-> energy in a thread earlier this week, in this sub.forum I think... please have a look around =)

I don't think popular science books is good for learning physics btw, but as dashaich said, it is the same things, but in SI units we have this conversion factor of c^2
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
8K
Replies
75
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top