- #1
Soph_the_Oaf
- 32
- 0
Hi there people
I'm going through some old notes and have become a bit confused... I'm looking at the energy density of e.m modes in a cavity
I have that
(energy in the range ω to ω+dω) = (mean number of quanta per mode) x (energy per quanta) x (number of e.m modes in the range ω to ω+dω)
which is
U(ω)dω = <n(ω)> h-bar ω G(ω)dω
Why do we use <n(ω)> h-bar ω and not ε = { <n(ω)> + 1) h-bar ω
because ε is the actual energy per mode and we are looking at the total energy in a given range??
I guess maybe I'm getting confused with a definition somewhere along the way... any insight would be greatly appreciated
Cheers
Soph
I'm going through some old notes and have become a bit confused... I'm looking at the energy density of e.m modes in a cavity
I have that
(energy in the range ω to ω+dω) = (mean number of quanta per mode) x (energy per quanta) x (number of e.m modes in the range ω to ω+dω)
which is
U(ω)dω = <n(ω)> h-bar ω G(ω)dω
Why do we use <n(ω)> h-bar ω and not ε = { <n(ω)> + 1) h-bar ω
because ε is the actual energy per mode and we are looking at the total energy in a given range??
I guess maybe I'm getting confused with a definition somewhere along the way... any insight would be greatly appreciated
Cheers
Soph