Energy transferred to nucleus in pair-production

AI Thread Summary
In pair production, textbooks often overlook the recoil energy of the nucleus, as it absorbs minimal energy and primarily serves to transfer momentum from the photon. The discussion raises the question of whether the nucleus could receive maximum energy when the kinetic energy of the produced electron and positron is zero, although such a scenario is unlikely. There is concern that some energy may contribute to nuclear excitation, complicating the energy distribution. The conversation emphasizes the challenge of applying energy and momentum conservation equations due to insufficient information, such as scattering angles or velocities. Ultimately, the focus remains on determining the maximum kinetic energy of the sodium atom within these constraints.
a1234
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Gamma rays of 22 MeV interact with a sodium sample, resulting in a pair-production reaction, in which an electron and positron are created in the vicinity of a nucleus:
(Photon + nucleus = e- + e+ + nucleus)
What would be the maximum transfer of energy to the sodium atoms in this reaction?
Relevant Equations
E_gamma = 2m_e*c^2 + KE- + KE+ + K_nucleus
In most textbooks, the recoil energy of the nucleus is ignored as it absorbs so little energy, and since its main role in the reaction is to absorb some of the photon's momentum without absorbing much energy.
I'm tempted to say that the nucleus gets the maximum energy when the kinetic energy of the electron and positron are zero, but I don't think we'd ever see an atom with a kinetic energy of 20.978 MeV. Wouldn't some of that energy go towards nuclear excitation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you are not over-thinking this?
 
I feel like I am. I've been staring at the energy and momentum conservation equations to try to find something more "sophisticated," but that doesn't seem to work out since we don't have enough information (e.g. the scattering angle or velocities of the electron-positron pair).
 
a1234 said:
I feel like I am. I've been staring at the energy and momentum conservation equations to try to find something more "sophisticated," but that doesn't seem to work out since we don't have enough information (e.g. the scattering angle or velocities of the electron-positron pair).
You're trying to find the maximum (kinetic) energy of the sodium atom. You've already established the criteria for that.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top