- #36
BvU
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 16,132
- 4,885
Did I miss the answer ?BvU said:Can you explain what this means ?Bhope69199 said:I have the oscilloscope data. I cropped the data so I have one wavelength of the pulse.
Bhope69199 said:Yes the pulse is very similar to your image but not exact.
Your reluctance to show the image is almost commendable.
So on the scope you almost see
Re-read post #20: ##x = \pi\ ## corresponds to t = 75 ##\mu##s, so ## a = 75 \mu s /\pi\ ## $$
10 \,\text{kV} \ \int_{-\infty}^\infty \operatorname {sinc} \left (t\over a\right ) \, dt= 0.75\,{\text Vs} $$
Your reluctance to show a schematic of the setup is also almost commendable.Bhope69199 said:What would you like a picture of? The setup is a pulse source connected to a capacitor and the voltage drop across the capacitor is measured.
Fortunately you dedicate a few words to it, so we can try to erverse engineer what we are talking and confusing each other about since Thursday:
So what is it ? 1MΩ or 900MΩ ? I hope the latter...Bhope69199 said:Oscilloscope 1MΩ impedance, Scope 900MΩ impedance. Not sure of the impedance of the pulse generating device but the resistance is approx. 9kΩ.
Now let's try to reproduce our excavations and draw the circuit:
which, according to your description, might be equivalent to
which means the capacitor discharges over the 9 k##\Omega## in about
I can't for the life of me understand how the pulse generator can come up with such a weird pulse shape, but other than that it looks like we have a bad case of impedance mismatching with ringing as a consequence.
Without further context in more detail it's hard to say anything sensible about this.
##\ ##
Last edited: