Epidemic models which incorporate disease evolution

In summary, the conversation discusses the topic of epidemic models and their ability to incorporate disease mutation. It is mentioned that the SIR model is commonly used and disease evolution is typically modeled probabilistically. The question is posed whether this is biologically relevant and if mutation rate can affect the susceptible component of the SIR model. An expert suggestion is made to refer to Paul Ewald's book on the evolution of infectious disease, specifically the section on the 1918-1919 flu pandemic, for further understanding. Quantifying the effects of mutation on epidemic progression is not discussed.
  • #1
*melinda*
86
0
I was wondering if anyone knew anything about epidemic models which take into account the ability of a disease to mutate. Basically I’m curious if there are any existing models which could predict how a rapidly changing disease might affect the progression of an epidemic, or how slower mutations in a disease might affect populations where that disease is endemic.

Based on what I’ve read so far it seems like the SIR (susceptible, infectious, recovered) model described by systems of differential equations is the standard epidemic model in use. And the only thing I know about disease evolution (i.e. genetic drift and shift) is that it seems to be modeled probabilistically. I’ve seen both topics covered independently, but so far I have not read anything that deals with how these things might interact.

Is this question in any way biologically relevant or realistic?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
In general, most mutations do not work to the favor of the pathogen.

So, what you are asking is: how can mutation rate affect the S component of SIR?
My opinion is that it can change. See Paul Ewald's 'Evolution of Infectious Disease' - the section on the increase in susceptibility/virulence that occurred during the Flu Pandemic of 1918-1919.

How you would quantify this is beyond me.
 
  • #3


Yes, incorporating the ability of a disease to mutate is a crucial aspect of epidemic modeling and is a biologically relevant and realistic question. In fact, there are several epidemic models that take into account the evolution of a disease. One example is the SEIR (susceptible, exposed, infectious, recovered) model which includes a latent period where individuals are exposed to the disease but not yet infectious. This model can also be extended to include mutations by incorporating a compartment for mutated strains of the disease.

Another approach is to use a network-based model, which takes into account the interactions between individuals and how the disease can spread through a population. In this type of model, the ability of a disease to mutate can significantly impact the spread of the disease, as it can change the transmissibility and severity of the disease.

There are also models that specifically focus on the evolution of a disease and how it may affect its ability to spread and cause an epidemic. For example, the quasispecies model is used to study the evolution of viruses and how mutations can lead to the emergence of new strains that may be more virulent or resistant to treatments.

In terms of predicting the effects of a rapidly changing disease, there are models that use real-time data to track the evolution of a disease and make predictions about its spread and potential impact. These models are constantly updated as new information becomes available and can be used to inform public health interventions and strategies.

Overall, incorporating disease evolution into epidemic models is crucial for understanding and predicting the spread of diseases and their potential impact on populations. It is an active area of research and there are various models and approaches being developed and used to address this important aspect of epidemiology.
 

FAQ: Epidemic models which incorporate disease evolution

How do epidemic models incorporate disease evolution?

Epidemic models incorporate disease evolution by taking into account factors such as the rate of infection, the rate of recovery, and the rate of immunity. These models use mathematical equations to simulate the spread and evolution of a disease within a population.

What are the different types of epidemic models?

There are several types of epidemic models, including compartmental models, network models, and spatial models. Compartmental models divide the population into different groups based on their disease status, while network models incorporate the complex social interactions that can contribute to disease spread. Spatial models take into account geographical factors that can affect the spread of a disease.

How are epidemic models used in public health?

Epidemic models are used in public health to predict the potential impact of a disease outbreak and inform public health interventions. These models can help public health officials make decisions about measures such as quarantine, vaccination, and social distancing to control and prevent the spread of a disease.

What are some limitations of epidemic models?

Epidemic models rely on assumptions and data that may not accurately reflect real-world situations. They also do not take into account individual behaviors and choices, which can greatly impact the spread of a disease. Additionally, these models may not be able to accurately predict the course of a novel disease or account for unforeseen variables.

How can epidemic models be improved?

Epidemic models can be improved by continuously updating and refining them with new data and information. Collaborating with experts in various fields, such as epidemiology, biology, and statistics, can also help improve the accuracy and effectiveness of these models. Additionally, incorporating real-time data and incorporating feedback from those affected by the disease can also improve the usefulness of epidemic models.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Back
Top