Epsilon-Delta Proof: Limiting x^2 + xy + y to 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stevecgz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Stevecgz
68
0
I'm working on an Epsilon-delta proof for:

\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow (1,1)} x^2 + xy + y = 3

I've tired a couple of different approaches but am not getting anywhere (I'm terrible at these). Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks.

Steve
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would you show us what you already tried?
 
Stevecgz said:
I'm working on an Epsilon-delta proof for:

\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow (1,1)} x^2 + xy + y = 3

I've tired a couple of different approaches but am not getting anywhere (I'm terrible at these). Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks.

Steve

Start off with the definition:

\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow (1,1)} x^2 + xy + y = 3 \mbox{ if, and only if }
\mbox{for every }\epsilon >0,\mbox{ there exists a }\delta >0 \mbox{ such that } 0<\sqrt{(x-1)^2+(y-1)^2}<\delta \mbox{ implies that }|x^2 + xy + y - 3| <\epsilon​
 
Prove that the sum of two continuous functions is itself a continuous function.
 
benorin said:
Start off with the definition:

\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow (1,1)} x^2 + xy + y = 3 \mbox{ if, and only if }
\mbox{for every }\epsilon >0,\mbox{ there exists a }\delta >0 \mbox{ such that } 0<\sqrt{(x-1)^2+(y-1)^2}<\delta \mbox{ implies that }|x^2 + xy + y - 3| <\epsilon​


Thanks benorin. I was trying with 0<\sqrt{x^2+y^2}<\delta. I think I can get it now.

Steve
 
By the way, while \sqrt{(x_1-x_0)^2+ (y_1-y_0)^2} is the "standard metric" it would be equivalent to show the "for every \epsilon&gt;0 there exist \delta&gt; 0 such that max (|x-1|,|y-1|)< \delta implies that |x2+ xy+ y- 3|<\epsilon and might be simpler. Of course, your teacher might require that you be able to show that they are equivalent!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply . Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top