Equation of states for a gas that forms dimers

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the equation of state for a gas that dimerizes, specifically showing that to a first approximation, the equation is given by PV/RT = 1 - Kc/V, where Kc is the equilibrium constant for the reaction A + A ⇌ A2. Participants explore the virial expansion and the relationship between the second virial coefficient B and Kc, with B needing to be expressed as -Kc. The conversation also clarifies that Kc should be based on concentrations rather than partial pressures. Ultimately, the relationship between the concentrations of A and A2 at varying volumes is established, leading to the conclusion that the total number of moles can be expressed as n = n0(1 - Kc/V).
Buffu
Messages
849
Reaction score
146

Homework Statement



Show that to a first approximation the equation of state of a gas that dimerizes to a small extent is given by,

##\dfrac{PV}{RT} = 1 - \dfrac{K_c}{V}##

Where ##K_c## is equilibrium constant for ##A + A \iff A_2##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Using virial expansion, I get

##\dfrac{PV}{RT} = 1 + \dfrac{B}{V} + \cdots##

Neglecting higher order terms,

I need to prove ##B = -\dfrac{[A]^2}{[A_2]} = - K_c##,

I know how to compute ##B## from already known equation of states but I don't know any relation between ##B## and ##K_c##.

Any hints please :).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Buffu said:

Homework Statement



Show that to a first approximation the equation of state of a gas that dimerizes to a small extent is given by,

##\dfrac{PV}{RT} = 1 - \dfrac{K_c}{V}##

Where ##K_c## is equilibrium constant for ##A + A \iff A_2##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Using virial expansion, I get

##\dfrac{PV}{RT} = 1 + \dfrac{B}{V} + \cdots##

Neglecting higher order terms,

I need to prove ##B = -\dfrac{[A]^2}{[A_2]} = - K_c##,

I know how to compute ##B## from already known equation of states but I don't know any relation between ##B## and ##K_c##.

Any hints please :).
Treat the gas as ideal, but with the number of moles changing.
 
Chestermiller said:
Treat the gas as ideal, but with the number of moles changing.

Let the amount of gas in moles be ##x## and intial amount be ##n## moles.

Then ##[A] = x/V## and ##[A_2] = (n -x)/V##

So, ##K_c = \dfrac{x^2}{V(n -x)}## --- (1)

also ##\dfrac{PV}{RT} = x## --- (2)

Should I solve for ##x## in ##(1)## and susbtitute it in ##(2)## ?

This does not feel correct.
 
What is Kc supposed to be? Is it supposed to be based on concentrations or partial pressures? The Kc as you have written it is based on $$A_2---> 2A_1$$. Is that what it is supposed to be?
 
Chestermiller said:
What is Kc supposed to be? Is it supposed to be based on concentrations or partial pressures? The Kc as you have written it is based on $$A_2---> 2A_1$$. Is that what it is supposed to be?
Concentrations.
 
OK. Here goes. At very large specific volumes, the contents of the tank will be all A, but, as the specific volume is decreased, some A2 will be formed at the expense of A. Let ##V_T## be the current volume of the tank, and let ##n_0## be the number of moles of A that would be present in the tank if ##V_T## became very large. At volume ##V_T##, suppose that there are now x moles of ##A_2##. Then the moles of A will be ##n_0-2x##, and the total number of moles will be ##n=n_0-x##. So, the concentrations of A and ##A_2## when the volume is ##V_T## will be:

$$[A]=\frac{(n_0-2x)}{V_T}$$
$$[A_2]=\frac{x}{V_T}$$

These concentrations are related by the equilibrium constant for the reaction:
$$\frac{[A_2]}{[A]^2}=\frac{xV_T}{(n_0-2x)^2}=K_C$$If we neglect 2x in comparison to ##n_0##, we can solve this equation for x, and obtain:
$$x=n_0^2\frac{K_C}{V_T}$$So the total number of moles at volume ##V_T## is given by:
$$n=n_0-n_0^2\frac{K_C}{V_T}=n_0\left(1-\frac{K_C}{(V_T/n_0)}\right)=n_0\left(1-\frac{K_C}{V}\right)$$where V is the apparent specific volume ##V_T/n_0##
 
  • Like
Likes Buffu

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
930
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K