Equations of motion for differential forms.

In summary, an equation of motion for differential forms is a mathematical expression that describes the behavior of physical systems using differential forms. These forms are used to represent the motion of objects and the forces acting on them, and allow for a more concise and elegant representation of equations. Examples of equations of motion for differential forms include Maxwell's equations, Euler-Lagrange equations, and Navier-Stokes equations. They differ from traditional equations of motion by using a more abstract mathematical framework, which allows for a more general and elegant description of physical systems. Applications of equations of motion for differential forms include designing structures and machines, analyzing fluid flows, and developing new theories in physics. They are also used in computer simulations and mathematical models to predict the behavior of complex
  • #1
AlphaNumeric2
42
2
I'm practicing some differential forms stuff and got a bit stuck on something. I'd type it out but the action is very long so it's easier if I just link to where I'm getting it from, this paper http://gesalerico.ft.uam.es/tesis/pablo_camara.pdf

Equation (4.20) (pdf page 51) is the IIA action with particular forms (4.21)-(4.23). (4.25) is derived from varying the metric, (4.26) by varying the dilaton. (4.27) to (4.29) are the ones I have problem with. I know they are from varying B2, C3 and A1 (respectively), using the equations in the footnote on page 50. (4.29) I can derive. It's (4.28) I'm stuck on. Here's what I've done :

[tex]\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial C_{3}} = d \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial(dC_{3})}[/tex] and [tex](F_{n})^{2} = n! F_{n} \wedge \ast F_{n}[/tex]
so
[tex]0 = d \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial C_{3}} \left\{ -\frac{1}{48}e^{\frac{\phi}{2}}(F_{4})^{2} + \frac{1}{2}B_{2}\wedge dC_{3} \wedge dC_{3} + \frac{m}{6}B_{2}\wedge B_{2}\wedge B_{2}\wedge dC_{3} \right\} \right)[/tex]

[tex]0 = d \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial C_{3}} \left\{ -\frac{1}{2}e^{\frac{\phi}{2}}F_{4}\wedge \ast F_{4} + \frac{1}{2}B_{2}\wedge dC_{3} \wedge dC_{3} + \frac{m}{6}B_{2}\wedge B_{2}\wedge B_{2}\wedge dC_{3} \right\} \right)[/tex]

[tex]0 = d \left( - e^{\frac{\phi}{2}} \ast F_{4} \right) + d \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial C_{3}} \left\{ B_{2}\wedge dC_{3} \wedge dC_{3} + \frac{m}{3}B_{2}\wedge B_{2}\wedge B_{2}\wedge dC_{3} \right\} \right)[/tex]

[tex]0 = d \left( - e^{\frac{\phi}{2}} \ast F_{4} \right) + d \left( 2 B_{2}\wedge dC_{3} + \frac{m}{3}B_{2}\wedge B_{2}\wedge B_{2} \right) [/tex]

[tex]d \left( e^{\frac{\phi}{2}} \ast F_{4} \right) = 2 dB_{2}\wedge dC_{3} + \frac{m}{3} 3 dB_{2}\wedge B_{2}\wedge B_{2} \right\} \right)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2}d \left( e^{\frac{\phi}{2}} \ast F_{4} \right) = dB_{2}\wedge dC_{3} + \frac{m}{2} dB_{2}\wedge B_{2}\wedge B_{2} \right\} \right)= H_{3} \wedge \left(dC_{3} + \frac{m}{2}B_{2}\wedge B_{2} \right) [/tex]

So

[tex]\frac{1}{2}d \left( e^{\frac{\phi}{2}} \ast F_{4} \right) = H_{3} \wedge \left( F_{4} + H_{3} \wedge A_{1} \right)[/tex]

The factor of 1/2 is wrong on the left hand side and I've the extra [tex]H_{3}\wedge H_{3} \wedge A_{1}[/tex] on the right hand side. I tried messing around with various things like integrating by parts etc but couldn't get it to work. I'm using the same methods I used to get (4.29) but it's not working here. Am I missing something obvious or is there a subtle trick?

Thanks for any help you can provide :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2




Thank you for sharing your difficulties with the equations (4.27) to (4.29) in the paper you linked. It seems like you are on the right track with your derivations, but there are a few things that may be causing the discrepancies you are experiencing.

First, the factor of 1/2 on the left-hand side of your final equation is indeed incorrect. It should be a factor of 2, as you correctly derived in the previous step. This may be a simple typo in your calculations.

Second, regarding the extra term on the right-hand side involving H_{3}\wedge H_{3} \wedge A_{1}, this may be due to a misunderstanding of the notation used in the paper. In the equations (4.27) to (4.29), the symbol \wedge is used to denote the wedge product of differential forms, not the exterior derivative. So, for example, in (4.27) the term H_{3}\wedge F_{4} should be read as the wedge product of the two forms, not the exterior derivative of H_{3} multiplied by F_{4}. This may be where the extra term is coming from in your derivation.

I would recommend going back through your calculations and double-checking if you are using the correct notation and if any typos may have occurred. Also, it may be helpful to consult a textbook or other resources on differential forms to make sure you are using the correct techniques. I hope this helps and good luck with your studies!
 
  • #3



The equations of motion for differential forms are a fundamental part of understanding the dynamics of fields in spacetime. In this paper, the author derives these equations for the type IIA supergravity theory, which describes the interactions of strings in 10-dimensional spacetime. The equations of motion are derived by varying the action with respect to the different fields present in the theory.

Equation (4.20) is the action for type IIA supergravity, and equations (4.21)-(4.23) are the specific forms for the fields in this theory. The author then goes on to derive the equations of motion for the metric (4.25) and the dilaton (4.26) by varying the action with respect to these fields. However, the author encounters some difficulty in deriving equation (4.28) for the field C3.

To derive this equation, the author uses the fact that the derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to C3 is equal to the exterior derivative of the derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to dC3. Using this and the fact that (Fn)^2 = n!Fn ∧ *Fn, the author manipulates the equation to eventually arrive at (4.28). However, the author notices that there is a factor of 1/2 on the left-hand side and an extra term on the right-hand side.

After trying various methods, the author realizes that there is a subtle trick involved in deriving this equation. The factor of 1/2 on the left-hand side can be resolved by integrating by parts, and the extra term on the right-hand side can be eliminated by using the definition of the Hodge dual. This leads to the final result of equation (4.28).

In conclusion, the derivation of the equations of motion for differential forms can involve some subtle tricks and careful manipulation of equations. But with perseverance and a good understanding of the underlying concepts, one can successfully derive these equations and gain a deeper understanding of the dynamics of fields in spacetime.
 

FAQ: Equations of motion for differential forms.

What is an equation of motion for differential forms?

An equation of motion for differential forms is a mathematical expression that describes the behavior of physical systems in terms of differential forms. It is typically used in the study of mechanics and electromagnetism, where it relates the motion of objects to the forces acting on them.

How are differential forms used in equations of motion?

Differential forms are used in equations of motion to describe the properties of physical systems in a way that is independent of coordinate systems. This allows for a more concise and elegant representation of the equations, making it easier to analyze and solve problems.

What are some examples of equations of motion for differential forms?

Examples of equations of motion for differential forms include the Maxwell's equations in electromagnetism, the Euler-Lagrange equations in classical mechanics, and the Navier-Stokes equations in fluid dynamics. These equations describe the behavior of physical systems in terms of differential forms such as vectors, tensors, and differential forms themselves.

How do equations of motion for differential forms differ from traditional equations of motion?

Equations of motion for differential forms differ from traditional equations of motion in that they use a more abstract mathematical framework. This allows for a more general and elegant description of physical systems, making it easier to handle complex problems and situations where traditional equations may not apply.

What are some applications of equations of motion for differential forms?

Equations of motion for differential forms have a wide range of applications in physics and engineering. They are used in the design of structures and machines, the analysis of fluid flows and aerodynamics, and the development of new theories in physics. They are also used in computer simulations and mathematical models to predict the behavior of complex systems.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
514
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
678
Back
Top