Equilibrium problem: Multiple forces acting on this hinged, supported beam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the resultant force acting on a hinged, supported beam under multiple forces. The user has derived reaction forces at points A and B, confirming equilibrium with a net force of zero. They seek clarification on how to determine a single equivalent force and its point of application, as specified in the problem statement. It is emphasized that if there is no net force but a net moment exists, the moment can be represented independently of the chosen axis. The goal is to replace the external loads with a single force that maintains the same moment about the specified axis.
Racoon5
Messages
6
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
For Replace the loading acting on the beam by a single resultant force. Specify where the force acts, measured from end A.
Relevant Equations
N/A
Hi, apart from the interesting wording of this question, I'm struggling to understand the concept of what we need to do here.

I started by having three equations (summation Fx, summation Fy and Moment about Y). I also calculated the two reaction forces about A and the one rection force about B (in y direction)

I got Ax= 125 , Ay= 293 and By= 1589
Summed up with all other x and y forces I am getting 0. How do I calculate a resultant force form that?

2. What exactly is asked by the question "specify where the force acts"? I'm assuming its not the angle to the x-axis

Thank you

Screenshot 2024-11-09 at 11.25.08 AM.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Racoon5 said:
Homework Statement: For Replace the loading acting on the beam by a single resultant force. Specify where the force acts, measured from end A.
Relevant Equations: N/A

Hi, apart from the interesting wording of this question, I'm struggling to understand the concept of what we need to do here.
They want you to replace the external loads with a single equivalent loading (as far as I can tell).
 
Last edited:
You are not being asked to find any reaction forces, though that may come later.

Given any collection of forces and moments acting on a body, and a specified axis, there is a resultant force and a resultant moment about that axis.

If there is no net force but there is a net moment, that moment is independent of the choice of axis.

If there is a net force, you can specify a line of action for it such that it has the same moment about the chosen axis as the resultant moment. In this way, you can completely represent the original collection of forces and moments by a single force applied at a certain point.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, Lnewqban and erobz
Racoon5 said:
I got Ax= 125 , Ay= 293 and By= 1589
Summed up with all other x and y forces I am getting 0. How do I calculate a resultant force form that?
Evidently, the system is in equilibrium regarding net forces and moments.
The isolated beam is under stress caused by external forces and moments.

Like a common spring, it is getting slightly deformed up to the point of inducing internal forces that compensate the external disturbance.
Could those external forces and moments be replaced with a single force acting along certain line?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top