Escape Velocity Calculation using Energy Conservation

In summary: Yes. If you use initial potential energy + initial kinetic energy = final potential energy (=0) + final kinetic energy (=0), you should have gotten the right answer.
  • #1
Void123
141
0
I do not have a solution to a question I'm working on, so I just wanted to make sure the procedure was correct.

Homework Statement



I have a force acting on a particle in one dimension. It is given an initial speed v-0 and the problem wants to know what the maximum speed v-0 will be within the limits of energy conservation.



Homework Equations



Energy conservation and force (dependent on position).



The Attempt at a Solution



What I did was integrated to find the potential energy function. I then set v-final equal to zero and solved for v-0.

Is this approach correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF!

Hi Void123! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
Void123 said:
I have a force acting on a particle in one dimension. It is given an initial speed v-0 and the problem wants to know what the maximum speed v-0 will be within the limits of energy conservation.

What I did was integrated to find the potential energy function. I then set v-final equal to zero and solved for v-0.

Is this approach correct?

I don't follow exactly what the question is, and particularly what vfinal has to do with it, :confused:

but generally you can use PE + KE = constant,

so maximum speed (which is what the question asks for) means maximum KE, and so means minimum PE.
 
  • #3


tiny-tim said:
Hi Void123! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)


I don't follow exactly what the question is, and particularly what vfinal has to do with it, :confused:

but generally you can use PE + KE = constant,

so maximum speed (which is what the question asks for) means maximum KE, and so means minimum PE.

I'm very sorry for not being specific enough. Actually, what the maximum speed was supposed to show was the speed it would have to reach before it can escape. The system I was dealing with was one of radial motion. Hence, if it reached an escape velocity the radius would go to infinity.

So, the initial speed (independent of the final) would have to be such that it would allow the particle to indefinitely escape the radial force holding it back.

I hope this clarifies everything :smile:
 
  • #4
Void123 said:
What I did was integrated to find the potential energy function. I then set v-final equal to zero and solved for v-0.

Is this approach correct?

Yes. If you use initial potential energy + initial kinetic energy = final potential energy (=0) + final kinetic energy (=0), you should have gotten the right answer.
 
  • #5
Hi Void123! :smile:
Void123 said:
I'm very sorry for not being specific enough. Actually, what the maximum speed was supposed to show was the speed it would have to reach before it can escape. The system I was dealing with was one of radial motion. Hence, if it reached an escape velocity the radius would go to infinity.

ok, that's not a maximum, no wonder I was confused! :rolleyes:

Let's look at the question again…
Void123 said:
I have a force acting on a particle in one dimension. It is given an initial speed v-0 and the problem wants to know what the maximum speed v-0 will be within the limits of energy conservation.

What I did was integrated to find the potential energy function. I then set v-final equal to zero and solved for v-0.

Is this approach correct?

What you're actually asking is not for a maximum speed, but for the initial speed (v0) which results in zero speed at infinity.

So yes, PE + KE = constant, and you want KE = 0 at infinity, so that means PE - PE0 = KE0

(btw, it doesn't have to be radial motion … with a conservative force, the path doesn't matter, and the escape speed will be the same, whatever the initial angle :wink:)
 

FAQ: Escape Velocity Calculation using Energy Conservation

What is classical physics?

Classical physics is a branch of physics that deals with the study of motion and forces in the macroscopic world, specifically at speeds much slower than the speed of light. It includes the principles of mechanics, thermodynamics, and electromagnetism.

What are the main principles of classical physics?

The main principles of classical physics are Newton's laws of motion, the law of conservation of energy, and the laws of thermodynamics. These principles help explain the behavior of objects in motion and the transfer of energy between different forms.

How is classical physics different from quantum physics?

Classical physics and quantum physics are two different branches of physics that explain the behavior of matter and energy. Classical physics deals with the macroscopic world and is based on the laws of motion and energy conservation, while quantum physics focuses on the microscopic world and is based on the principles of uncertainty and probability.

What are some real-world applications of classical physics?

Classical physics has many practical applications in everyday life, such as the design and operation of machines, vehicles, and buildings. It also helps us understand weather patterns, the behavior of fluids, and the principles of electricity and magnetism used in technology.

Can classical physics explain all phenomena in the universe?

No, classical physics cannot explain all phenomena in the universe. It is limited to the macroscopic world and cannot fully explain the behavior of subatomic particles or the effects of gravity on a cosmic scale. This is where theories from other branches of physics, such as quantum mechanics and general relativity, come into play.

Back
Top