Estimating Bacterial Growth and Doubling Period: 4080 Bacteria in 5 Minutes

  • Thread starter thomasrules
  • Start date
In summary, the bacteria population in a culture starts at 200 and grows to 4080 after five minutes. Using the equation N=Ni*e^(k*t), where N is the final population, Ni is the initial population, k is the growth rate, and t is time, we can estimate the doubling period to be approximately 1.149 minutes. This can also be calculated using the equation N = 200e^(kt), where N is the final population, k is the growth rate, and t is time, with k being approximately 0.603.
  • #1
thomasrules
243
0
There are initially 200 bacteria in a culture. After five minutes, the population has grown to 4080 bacteria. Estimate the doubling period.

I DID THIS:

[tex]4080=200(k)^5

4080/200=k^5

k=1.82[/tex]

IS THIS CORRECT?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
what equation are you using? Exponential growth is N=Ni*e^(k*t). It doen't look like you did that. And simply solving the equation is not answering estimate the doubling period. once you solve for k you will need to then solve for t when the bacteria population is 400.
 
  • #3
ok:
4080=200(k)^5

4080/200}=k^5

k=1.82

I"M USING N=k(a)^x
 
  • #4
thomasrules said:
ok:
4080=200(k)^5

4080/200}=k^5

k=1.82

I"M USING N=k(a)^x
You can do it your way, but you actually used (k) in place of (a), or N = a(k)^x. Your k is just a bit off. Check it again. Now you need to find x that satisfies

400 = 200(k)^x

It doesn't have to be 400 and 200. All that is required is that the ratio be 2.
 
  • #5
[tex] N = N_{0}e^{kt} [/tex], [tex] N(0) = 200 [/tex].[tex] N = 200e^{kt} [/tex]

[tex] 4080 = 200e^{5k} [/tex]

[tex] k \doteq 0.603 [/tex]

doubling time = 1.149 mins
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Estimating Bacterial Growth and Doubling Period: 4080 Bacteria in 5 Minutes

Is it really correct?

Yes, based on the information and evidence we have, it is correct.

How can we be sure that it is correct?

We can verify its correctness through experiments, observations, and peer review.

What makes it correct?

The fact that it aligns with established theories, principles, and laws in the field of study.

Can it ever be incorrect?

Yes, as new information and advancements emerge, the current understanding of what is correct can change.

What are the implications of it being correct?

It can lead to further understanding and advancements in the field, and potentially have real-world applications and benefits.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top