- #36
baywax
Gold Member
- 2,176
- 1
greghouse said:OK this is just plain crap. What you speak of is sympathy. The difference between sympathy and empathy is that you learn sympathy, but you can't learn empathy.
Next you'll be BS'ing me that solving a math problem is a genetic trait.
Empathy is a learned ability.
(emphasis added)The Study of Cognitive Empathy and Empathic Accuracy
Besides a growing interest in person perception among psychologists in the 1950's (e.g., Heider (1958)), researchers from the counseling and therapeutic milieu were keen on investigating empathic accuracy, since empathy was seen as being essential for successful therapy.
In conceiving of a client centered therapy, Rogers defines empathy early on as the ability to “ perceive the internal frame of reference of another with accuracy and with the emotional components and meanings which pertain thereto as if one were the person, but without ever losing the ‘as if’ conditions”
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/empathy/cognitive.html
Empathy is highly dependent upon imagination and, as far as I know, imagination is something that must be exercised and trained before it becomes an ability like empathy.
Dymond's (1949) influential “scale for rating empathic ability” can be used to illustrate this fact. (For other methods of measuring empathic accuracy see Taft 1955, Davis and Kraus 1997)). Dymond defined empathy in the tradition of Rogers as the “imaginative transposing of oneself into the thinking, feeling, and acting of another person and so structuring the world as he does” (1949, 127).
Perhaps you are confusing the fact that having a brain is a genetically predetermined condition with the fact that you must use your brain to gain an empathic understanding of a subject.