Euclidean metric (L2 norm) versus taxicab metric(L1 norm)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the Euclidean metric (L2 norm) is always less than or equal to the taxicab metric (L1 norm) for any vector x in R^n. The individual seeks a method to demonstrate this relationship, noting that it appears obvious but requires formal proof. The proposed approach involves showing that the expression (||x||1)² - (||x||2)² is never negative. This suggests a mathematical exploration of the properties of these norms to establish the inequality. The conversation centers on the mathematical rigor needed to validate this comparison between the two metrics.
mglaros
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I was just wondering how I would go about proving that the euclidean metric is always smaller than or equal to the taxicab metric for a given vector x in R^n. The result seems obvious but I am not sure how I would show this.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show that (||x||1)2 - (||x||2)2 can never be negative.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K