A Euler Lagrange and the Calculus of Variations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the independent variation of position and velocity when formulating the Lagrangian for a simple mechanical system in one dimension. The original poster initially struggled with the concept but received clarification that Lagrangian mechanics focuses on variations in position rather than velocity. It was noted that Hamiltonian mechanics operates in configuration space, which includes both position and velocity. Ultimately, the poster acknowledged the misunderstanding and expressed gratitude for the assistance received. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying variations in the context of Lagrangian mechanics.
Trying2Learn
Messages
375
Reaction score
57
TL;DR Summary
I cannot extract the Euler-Lagrange equation with different variation functions
Good Morning all

Yesterday, as I was trying to formulate my confusion properly, I had a series of posts as I circled around the issue.

I can now state it clearly: something is wrong :-) and I am so confused :-(

Here is the issue:

I formulate the Lagrangian for a simple mechanical system (let's go with 1D)

I formulate the variation of the position and the variation of the velocity, use the Gateaux derivative, work it though..

However, as I understand, I MUST vary the position and velocity INDEPENDENTLY!

And that is where the problem begins (for me)

Could someone read the attached, one page and tell me where I go wrong?

(And if someone can tell me how, I can post a Matlab code that actually tries DIFFERENT eta functions and shows that the correct solutoin produces a stationary Action -- and plots the area between KE and PE)
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is puzzling to me why you insist on an approach where position and velocity are varied independently

You appear to be referring to configuration space. For motion in the case of 1D spatial space: in terms of configuration space you have the position coordinate and the velocity coordinate.
Hamiltonian mechanics is formulated in terms of motion in configuration space.Lagrangian mechanics, the mechanics that uses the Euler-Lagrange equation, is formulated in terms of motion in spatial space.

To derive the Euler-Lagrange equation the applicable variation is variation of position.
 
Cleonis said:
It is puzzling to me why you insist on an approach where position and velocity are varied independently

You appear to be referring to configuration space. For motion in the case of 1D spatial space: in terms of configuration space you have the position coordinate and the velocity coordinate.
Hamiltonian mechanics is formulated in terms of motion in configuration space.Lagrangian mechanics, the mechanics that uses the Euler-Lagrange equation, is formulated in terms of motion in spatial space.

To derive the Euler-Lagrange equation the applicable variation is variation of position.
Ah ha! You are correct!

I also found this, just now

https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...it-make-sense-to-vary-the-position-and-the-ve

OK, so I am fine.

Sorry to have been a bother.

But thank you, everyone
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top