Euler vs. Tait (steady precession vs... what?)

In summary, the two general approaches for studying body rotations are Euler angles and Tait-Bryan angles. The main difference is that Tait-Bryan angles represent rotations about three distinct axes while Euler angles use the same axis for both the first and third elemental rotations. In Tait-Bryan angles, the analogous case to steady precession in Euler angles is called "Steady Turn" or "Constant Turn." This refers to a scenario where the yaw rate is constant, the pitch rate is zero, and the roll rate is constant, with the object being banked or tilted to one side.
  • #1
Trying2Learn
377
57
TL;DR Summary
what is the analogue of steady precession when using the Tait -Bryan angles
Good Morning

When one studies body rotations, there are two general approaches one uses: Euler Angles vs. Tait-Bryan Angles.

The significant difference is that:
  • Tait–Bryan angles represent rotations about three distinct axes (e.g. x-y-z, or x-y′-z″): Yaw, Pitch, Roll
  • Euler angles use the same axis for both the first and third elemental rotations (e.g., z-x-z, or z-x′-z″): Precession, Nutation, Spin

With Euler angles, there is a special case of STEADY PRECESSION: precession rate is constant, nutation rate is 0, spin rate is constant.

Is there a NAME for the analogous case, when modeling with Tait? Yaw rate is constant, pitch rate is 0, roll rate is constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, there is a name for the analogous case in Tait-Bryan angles. It's called "Steady Turn," also known as "Constant Turn" or "Banked Turn." In this case, the yaw rate is constant, the pitch rate is zero, and the roll rate is constant. The term "banked turn" refers to the fact that the vehicle or object is banked or tilted to one side, like an airplane during a turn. This term is commonly used in aviation and aerospace engineering.
 
  • Informative
Likes berkeman

FAQ: Euler vs. Tait (steady precession vs... what?)

What is the Euler vs. Tait debate about?

The Euler vs. Tait debate revolves around the description of the motion of rotating rigid bodies, specifically the differences in their approaches to steady precession and the more general rotational motion. Euler's equations describe the motion of a rotating rigid body without external torques, while Tait's work extends these ideas, particularly in the context of gyroscopic motion and precession.

What is steady precession in the context of rotational motion?

Steady precession refers to a situation where a rotating body, such as a gyroscope, maintains a constant angle between its axis of rotation and another reference axis, typically due to an external torque. This results in the axis of rotation describing a cone around the reference axis at a constant angular velocity.

How do Euler's equations describe rotational motion?

Euler's equations describe the rotational motion of a rigid body in terms of its angular velocities and the moments of inertia about its principal axes. These equations are derived from Newton's second law for rotational systems and provide a set of three coupled differential equations that predict how the angular velocity vector changes over time.

What contributions did Tait make to the understanding of rotational motion?

Peter Guthrie Tait contributed significantly to the understanding of rotational motion by extending Euler's work to include gyroscopic effects and the phenomenon of precession. Tait's work provided a more comprehensive framework for understanding how forces and torques influence the motion of rotating bodies, particularly in the context of gyroscopes and other practical applications.

Why is the Euler vs. Tait discussion still relevant today?

The Euler vs. Tait discussion remains relevant because it highlights fundamental principles of rotational dynamics that are crucial for various modern applications, including aerospace engineering, robotics, and the study of celestial mechanics. Understanding the nuances of these theories helps in the design and control of systems involving rotational motion, such as satellites, drones, and mechanical gyroscopes.

Similar threads

A Corresponding case of steady precession but for Tait-Bryan angles
Replies
1
Views
820
A Euler, Tait-Bryan, Tait, proper, Improper
Replies
1
Views
1K
Understanding the Differences between Euler Versus Tait Angles
Replies
2
Views
4K
I The Gyroscopic Effect: Precession, Nutation, & Boomerang Return
Replies
4
Views
2K
A What happens first: precession or nutation?
Replies
1
Views
1K
A How do you KNOW the Euler (Tait) angles cover orienations
Replies
6
Views
2K
A Are Tait and Euler angles a complete parametrization of 3D space?
Replies
7
Views
1K
I What Determines the Order of Rotations for a Gyro?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Torque required to prevent precession
Replies
2
Views
1K
Chandler wobble: nutation or precession?
Replies
2
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top