Evaluate the Following Line Integral Part 3

In summary: Otherwise, it's just a constant, and the integral would be too easy. :DSo, the final integral should be:\displaystyle \int_{C} ((1+2t)^2 i+4^2 j+(-1+t)^2 k)\cdot(2i+0j+k) dtAnd the result should be a number. :)In summary, the given line integral is evaluated by splitting the curve C into two subcurves, C1 and C2, and computing the integral over each subcurve separately. The limits for both integrals are 0 and 1. The final integral includes "dt" and the result is a number.
  • #1
bugatti79
794
1

Homework Statement



[itex]\displaystyle \int x^2dx+y^2dy+z^2dz[/itex] where C is the line segment from(0,0,0) to (1,2,-1) and (1,2,-1) to (3,2,0)

Homework Equations



[itex]\displaystyle\int_c \vec F(t) d \vec r(t)= (x^2 i+ y^2 j+z^2 k)d \vec r(t)[/itex]

where [itex]d \vec r(t)[/itex] for C_1=ti+2tj-tk and [itex] d \vec r(t) for C_1=(1+2t)i+2j+(-1+t)k[/itex]

Therefore [itex] \displaystyle \int_{C1} ((1+2t)^2 i+4^2 j+(-1+t)^2 k)(2i+0j+k)[/itex]

Is this correct so far?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hAlso, How do I determine the limits.

Note I have used LaTex to make it prettier. Thanks
 
  • #3
Hi bugatti79! :smile:

Pretty! I like it!

Apparently you have split the curve C into 2 subcurves: C1 and C2.
At least... you named the 2nd subcurve C1. Is that a typo?

In your choice for those 2 curves, you selected equations such that at t=0 you're in the first point, and at t=1 you're in the 2nd point.
But these are equations for r(t) and not for dr(t).
To find dr(t) you still need to take the derivative.

The complete curve would consist of the sum of the integral over C1 and the integral over C2.
With your choice for the equations, both integrals would have limits 0 and 1.
 
  • #4
I like Serena said:
Hi bugatti79! :smile:

Pretty! I like it!

Apparently you have split the curve C into 2 subcurves: C1 and C2.
At least... you named the 2nd subcurve C1. Is that a typo?

In your choice for those 2 curves, you selected equations such that at t=0 you're in the first point, and at t=1 you're in the 2nd point.
But these are equations for r(t) and not for dr(t).
To find dr(t) you still need to take the derivative.

The complete curve would consist of the sum of the integral over C1 and the integral over C2.
With your choice for the equations, both integrals would have limits 0 and 1.

Hi,

Yes, that's a typo.

Ah, that's making sense now regarding the limits...I will re attempt tomorrow, its bedtime! Thanks
 
  • #5
bugatti79 said:

Homework Statement



[itex]\displaystyle \int x^2dx+y^2dy+z^2dz[/itex] where C is the line segment from(0,0,0) to (1,2,-1) and (1,2,-1) to (3,2,0)

Homework Equations



[itex]\displaystyle\int_c \vec F(t) d \vec r(t)= (x^2 i+ y^2 j+z^2 k)d \vec r(t)[/itex]

where [itex]\vec r(t)[/itex] for C_1=ti+2tj-tk and [itex] \vec r(t) for C_2=(1+2t)i+2j+(-1+t)k[/itex]

Therefore [itex] \displaystyle \int_{C1} ((1+2t)^2 i+4^2 j+(-1+t)^2 k)(2i+0j+k)[/itex]

Is this correct so far?

Hi,
The equations I have written for C1 and C2 are for r(t) yes...the above should be correct now...?
 
  • #6
bugatti79 said:
Hi,
The equations I have written for C1 and C2 are for r(t) yes...the above should be correct now...?

Almost. You corrected the typo on the definition of C2.

But your integral is for C2 and not for C1.
And you need a result for C which is C1 combined with C2.
 
  • #7
I like Serena said:
Almost. You corrected the typo on the definition of C2.

But your integral is for C2 and not for C1.
And you need a result for C which is C1 combined with C2.

Yes, that's another typo.

[itex]\displaystyle \int_{C2} ((1+2t)^2 i+4^2 j+(-1+t)^2 k)(2i+0j+k)[/itex]

Ok, and since the 2 brackets is a dot product the basis i,j and k will go to 1 upon multiplcation.

Similar for C1. Evalute the 2 integrals and then add. Should get a number because F.dr is as scalar. Correct?

Thanks
 
  • #8
bugatti79 said:
Yes, that's another typo.

[itex]\displaystyle \int_{C2} ((1+2t)^2 i+4^2 j+(-1+t)^2 k)(2i+0j+k)[/itex]

Ok, and since the 2 brackets is a dot product the basis i,j and k will go to 1 upon multiplcation.

Similar for C1. Evalute the 2 integrals and then add. Should get a number because F.dr is as scalar. Correct?

Thanks

Yes. :)

Btw, you integral should also include "dt".
 

FAQ: Evaluate the Following Line Integral Part 3

1. What is a line integral?

A line integral is a mathematical concept in calculus that represents the total value of a function along a given curve or path. It is similar to a regular integral, but instead of integrating over an area, it integrates over a line or curve.

2. How is a line integral evaluated?

A line integral is evaluated by first parameterizing the curve or path into a set of equations. Then, the integral is calculated using the appropriate integration method, such as the fundamental theorem of calculus or the line integral formula.

3. What is the purpose of evaluating a line integral?

The purpose of evaluating a line integral is to determine the total value of a function along a given path. This can be helpful in various fields of science, such as physics, engineering, and economics, where calculating the total value of a quantity along a specific path is necessary.

4. What are some applications of line integrals?

Line integrals have many practical applications, such as calculating work done by a force, finding the mass of a wire or rope, determining the flow of a fluid, and calculating electric potential and magnetic fields in physics.

5. Are there any limitations to evaluating line integrals?

Yes, there are some limitations to evaluating line integrals. One limitation is that the curve or path must be continuous and differentiable. Additionally, the integrand must also be continuous and differentiable along the path. In some cases, the path may also need to be closed for the integral to be well-defined.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
844
Replies
9
Views
751
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
674
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top