Evaluating Integral using Parts

In summary, the conversation discusses the process of evaluating integrals involving square roots and trigonometric functions. One person suggests using trigonometric substitution, while another suggests using integration by parts. They also discuss the importance of correctly substituting variables and finding the correct antiderivative.
  • #1
doublehh06
17
0
Pardon my use of the program! I am new to Physics Forums!

Homework Statement


EVALUATE

The Integral of: Square root of (x^2 + 2x)
The Integral of: x * Square root of (x^2 + 7)

Homework Equations



Integrating by Parts Method

The Integral of udv = u*v - the integral of v*du

The Attempt at a Solution



I am confused as to which parts should be u and which should be dv. It is just with square roots when this happens and I just would like some guidance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There's no need to integrate by parts. Just use trigonometric substitution. For 1, you will need to complete the square first...
 
  • #3
for x(sqrt[x^2+7]) you can also use simple substitution where u=(x^2+7) and du=2x, which makes it into the integral of (1/2)(u)^(1/2)du, which gives you (1/3)(x^2+7)^(3/2)
 
  • #4
Micromass -

When you say complete the square, what do you mean?

If I complete the square, that would give me the square root of (x+1)^2 - 1, right?
Then do I use trigonometic substitution?
 
  • #5
doublehh06 said:
Micromass -

When you say complete the square, what do you mean?

If I complete the square, that would give me the square root of (x+1)^2 - 1, right?
Then do I use trigonometic substitution?

Right, but before you do trigonometric substitution, first substitute u=x+1...
 
  • #6
I have the answer (found in my textbook for the homework problem) which is:

1/2 * (x+1) * The Integral of: Square Root of (x^2 + 2x) - 1/2 the natural log of (x +1 + square root of (x^2 + 2x)) + C

Sorry... I have tried to do this even with the u substitution. I am just completely clueless with how to get to this point!
 
  • #7
With the u-substitution, you've got

[tex]\int{\sqrt{u^2-1}du}[/tex]

Now, try a trigonometric substitution. Something like u=sec(v)...
 
  • #8
So then with the U-Substitution,

We would have sec2u-1du beneath the square root. Does this then turn into tan2udu beneath the square root and then I perform the integral or try to do substitution again, etc.?
 
  • #9
The Final Answer is:

\displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}(x+1)\sqrt{x^2+2x}-\displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}\ln{|x+1+\sqrt{x^2+2x}|}+C

This is in the form of

\int{udv}=uv-\int{vdu}

Which is valid for integration by parts.. I know we have to do trigonometric substitution also, but I don't know how we will get to the final answer using trig substitution.

I did all of the codes using the PF LaTeX Preview, but they still aren't showing up right here in the forum. Sorry!
 
  • #10
doublehh06 said:
So then with the U-Substitution,

We would have sec2u-1du beneath the square root. Does this then turn into tan2udu beneath the square root and then I perform the integral?

Yes, just substitute u=sec(v) and perform the integral...
 
  • #11
doublehh06 said:
The Final Answer is:

[tex]\displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}(x+1)\sqrt{x^2+2x}-\displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}\ln{|x+1+\sqrt{x^2+2x}|}+C[/tex]

This is in the form of

[tex]\int{udv}=uv-\int{vdu}[/tex]

Which is valid for integration by parts.. I know we have to do trigonometric substitution also, but I don't know how we will get to the final answer using trig substitution.

I did all of the codes using the PF LaTeX Preview, but they still aren't showing up right here in the forum. Sorry!

By adding the LaTeX tags you can get this to display properly. Click on the LaTeX image (or just quote me) on your quote above to see the code that generated each image :wink:
 
  • #12
doublehh06 said:
So then with the U-Substitution,

We would have sec2u-1du beneath the square root. Does this then turn into tan2udu beneath the square root and then I perform the integral or try to do substitution again, etc.?

[tex]\sqrt{tan^{2}u}du=tanudu[/tex]

what is the integral of tanudu? and re substitute
 
  • #13
The integral of tanudu is -ln|cos{u}|+C which then turns into -ln|cos{x+1}|+C.

This still isn't the right answer which can be seen in the previous quote by saladsamurai.
Something is still going wrong!
 
  • #14
If you use a u-substitution like u = sec v, you must find du from that and replace the du from the previous integral you had.
 
  • #15
I'm completely lost still. I can't get past the answer I had before. I just don't understand how to do this combination of integration by parts AND trigonometric substitution.
 
  • #16
You did your substitution u=sec(v) wrong. You need to replace the du to...
Can you give me the general formula for substitution??
 
  • #17
I don't know what the general formula is... I just know that if you substitute in for u than your du value changes also. I have done substitution before and been fine, but I can't give you a general formula.
 
  • #18
Fine, if you substitute u=sec(v). You shouldn't forget to change the du... If u=sec(v), then what does du equal?
 
  • #19
du = sec(v)tan(v)
 
  • #20
Yes, so your integral becomes

[tex]\int{\tan^2(v)\sec(v)dv}[/tex]

Try to solve this integral...
 
  • #21
Do I have to perform yet another substitution to solve this integral? substituting a variable in for sec (v) like t making the new integral:

t^2 dt?
 
  • #22
Start by writing everything in cos(v). Thus change that tan(v) and sec(v), such that you arrive with something with only cos(v).
 
  • #23
My steps to get something with only cos(v) are as follows:

sin^2(v)/cos^2(v) * (1/cos(v))dv

(1-cos^2(v))/cos^2(v) * (1/cos(v))dv

(1-cos^2(v))/cos^3(v) dv

1/cos^3(v) - 1/cos(v)

Is this the right integral I should end up with?
 
  • #24
Yes, that would be correct!
 
  • #25
Now, once I perform that integral do I just resubstitute a lot to get to the correct answer? I mean, when finding the antiderivative of something which has a trig function in it, you almost always get something with a trig function still in it. I am still not seeing how this will lead to the final answer which has no trig function in it at all.
 
  • #26
I've got some work done on my own now and have started to resubstitute to get back to having the function in terms of x.

Can anyone tell me what tan * sec^-1(x) is equal to?
 
  • #27
doublehh06 said:
I've got some work done on my own now and have started to resubstitute to get back to having the function in terms of x.

Can anyone tell me what tan * sec^-1(x) is equal to?
As it stands, it doesn't equal anything. You can't have tan all by itself any more than you can have [itex]\sqrt[/itex] all by itself. tan is a function, so you have to specify what it's operating on.
 
  • #28
doublehh06 said:
du = sec(v)tan(v)

That would be du = sec(v)tan(v)dv
Don't leave this off! If you do, it will come around and bite you later.
 
  • #29
I figured it out on my own! Thanks to everyone who helped on this problem! :)
 

FAQ: Evaluating Integral using Parts

What is the formula for evaluating an integral using parts?

The formula for evaluating an integral using parts is ∫u(x)v'(x)dx = [u(x)v(x)] - ∫v(x)u'(x)dx.

When should I use the integration by parts method?

The integration by parts method should be used when the integral involves a product of two functions, and there is no clear substitution that can be used to simplify the integral.

How do I choose which function to use for u and v in the integration by parts method?

The general rule for choosing u and v is to select u as the function that becomes simpler after differentiation, and v as the function that becomes simpler after integration.

Can the integration by parts method be used for definite integrals?

Yes, the integration by parts method can be used for definite integrals. In this case, the formula becomes ∫a to b u(x)v'(x)dx = [u(x)v(x)] from a to b - ∫a to b v(x)u'(x)dx.

Are there any tips for simplifying the integral before using the integration by parts method?

One tip for simplifying the integral before using the integration by parts method is to try to factor out a common term or use algebraic manipulation to make the integral easier to integrate.

Similar threads

Back
Top