Evaluating Limit: lim x--> 2+ (5(x-2))^(x-2)

  • Thread starter mattmannmf
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Limit
In summary, we evaluated the limit of a function as x approaches 2 from the positive side. We first let y = the limit and then took the natural log. By using L'Hopital's rule and simplifying the algebra, we found that the limit is equal to 0. This means that the natural log of the function approaches 0 as x approaches 2 from the positive side.
  • #1
mattmannmf
172
0
Evaluate limit

lim x--> 2+ (5(x-2))^(x-2)

so what i did i let y= that limit
Then i took the natural log:

lim x --> 2+ (x-2) ln| (5(x-2))

then i put it in the form of L'hopitals rule:

lim x--> 2+ (ln |(5(x-2))) / 1/(x-2) ...when i plug in 2 for x, both equations DNE so it fits the rule

So i get the function [5(5x-10)^-1] / [ -(x-2)^-2]
I just find that by looking at what the equation is, every time i apply l'hopitals rule, it will just keep growing within the negative powers.. I am not sure what to do, if i did something wrong, or what i should try?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Try and simplify the algebra before you do l'Hopital again.
 
  • #3
simplify it anymore? like square the denominator?:

[5/(5x-10)] / [-1/ (x^2-4x+4)]
thats all i can think off...
 
  • #4
You just need to simplify the expression you got after applying L'Hopital's rule, and you'll see nothing blows up when you let x go to 2.
 
  • #5
(x-2) divides (5x-10). There's a more profitable way to simplify.
 
  • #6
oh wait... would i re-raise the equation from the denominator and like re-due l'hopitals rule: here is what i mean if that was confusing

Here was the equation we had when i first used the rule:
[5(5x-10)^-1] / [ -(x-2)^-2]

now ill re raise it
-(x-2)^2* [5/ (5x-10)]

and reuse l'hopitals rule but with new equations in the numerator and denominator:
[ -5(x-2)^2] / [1/ (5x-10)]

i don't know... maybe I am going in the wrong direction.
 
  • #7
mattmannmf said:
oh wait... would i re-raise the equation from the denominator and like re-due l'hopitals rule: here is what i mean if that was confusing

Here was the equation we had when i first used the rule:
[5(5x-10)^-1] / [ -(x-2)^-2]

now ill re raise it
-(x-2)^2* [5/ (5x-10)]

and reuse l'hopitals rule but with new equations in the numerator and denominator:
[ -5(x-2)^2] / [1/ (5x-10)]

i don't know... maybe I am going in the wrong direction.

Cancel the common factor before you do anything. And your algebra doesn't quite look right there.
 
  • #8
sorry the new equation would be
[ -5(x-2)^2] / [5x-10]
 
  • #9
You can l'Hopital it again now, or you can just cancel the common factor.
 
  • #10
Oh i think i understand what your saying
the equation would be:
5/ (5x-10) * (x-2)^2

you can simplify the 5x-10 by doing (5(x-2)) So..

5/5(x-2) * x-2^2

so the x-2 gets rid off and the sqrd on top gets gone leaving:

5/5 * x-2 or simply x-2?
 
  • #11
sorry i forgot to include the negative:
so final answer would be -(x-2) or (2-x)
 
  • #12
so the limit as x--> 2+ for the ln of the function is 0?
 
  • #13
Yup.
 

FAQ: Evaluating Limit: lim x--> 2+ (5(x-2))^(x-2)

What is the limit of the given function as x approaches 2 from the right?

The limit of the given function is 0.

How do you evaluate the limit of a function at a specific point?

To evaluate the limit of a function at a specific point, you can plug in the value of the point into the function and simplify the expression. Alternatively, you can use algebraic manipulation or L'Hopital's rule to evaluate the limit.

What is the significance of evaluating a limit?

Evaluating a limit allows us to determine the behavior of a function near a specific point. It can help us understand the continuity, differentiability, and overall behavior of a function.

Is the limit of a function always equal to the value of the function at that point?

No, the limit of a function may not always be equal to the value of the function at a specific point. This is because the limit considers the behavior of the function as the input approaches the point, while the value of the function is just the output at that point.

Can a limit exist if the function is not defined at that point?

Yes, a limit can exist even if the function is not defined at that point. This is because the limit considers the behavior of the function as the input approaches the point, rather than the value of the function at that point.

Similar threads

Back
Top