Even with a whimsical mathematical usage, solutions are obtained!

In summary, the conversation discusses the properties of the real and complex logarithm and how they relate to each other. It is mentioned that as long as one is dealing with analytic functions, the real function is just a restriction of the complex analytic function. The term "analytical" is also explored, which is typically reserved for functions expressed as a series. It is noted that when studying complex analysis, "analytical" and "holomorphic" are often used interchangeably.
  • #1
Z-10-46
1
0
TL;DR Summary
Even with a whimsical mathematical usage, coherent solutions are obtained!
Hello everyone,
logcomplexe 1.JPG

logcomplexe 2.JPG

Here, we observe that the familiar properties of the real logarithm hold true for the complex logarithm in these examples.

So why does a whimsical mathematical use of real logarithm properties yield coherent solutions even in the case of complex logarithm?
 

Attachments

  • Vitesse de la lumiere 1.JPG
    Vitesse de la lumiere 1.JPG
    55.9 KB · Views: 76
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
As long as you are dealing with analytic functions, the real function is just a restriction of the complex analytic function. Two analytic functions can only be identical on the real line if they are identical.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and fresh_42
  • #3
FactChecker said:
As long as you are dealing with analytic functions, the real function is just a restriction of the complex analytic function. Two analytic functions can only be identical on the real line if they are identical.
The term analytical is very interesting. It is reserved for functions that have an expression as a series. And that was how mathematicians regarded all functions for a long time, as series.
 
  • #4
fresh_42 said:
The term analytical is very interesting. It is reserved for functions that have an expression as a series. And that was how mathematicians regarded all functions for a long time, as series.
When I studied complex analysis, "analytical" and "holomorphic" were assumed to mean more or less the same thing.
 
  • #5
Svein said:
When I studied complex analysis, "analytical" and "holomorphic" were assumed to mean more or less the same thing.
Isn't that still the case?
 
  • #6
fresh_42 said:
Isn't that still the case?
I certainly hope so. But the definition used to be "functions that satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations".
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Back
Top