- #36
Fra
- 4,209
- 633
We seem to share some common ideas, I'm philosophical to mind, but of course philosophy along isn't the end of story, I have no intention of "prooving my philosophy" because I can't . That serves only one purpose, and that is to guide me forward.
In a certain senes, scientific models produce predictions and can thus be thought of like a black box, and some people not into philosophy only conclude if the black box is useful or not. So far that's fine. But of course, the interesting question is howto improve the black box, when it's wrong?
To explain my philosophy, my focus is not on the black box, it's on the evolution of the black box, relative to the previous state. I consider that to be more fundamental.
Time is the main problem, of hobby based research. But the major advantage OTHO is no affiliation, no worrying about pleasing funders. I have no reason whatsoever to take shortcuts because I'm fooling no one but myself.
/Fredrik
In a certain senes, scientific models produce predictions and can thus be thought of like a black box, and some people not into philosophy only conclude if the black box is useful or not. So far that's fine. But of course, the interesting question is howto improve the black box, when it's wrong?
To explain my philosophy, my focus is not on the black box, it's on the evolution of the black box, relative to the previous state. I consider that to be more fundamental.
Time is the main problem, of hobby based research. But the major advantage OTHO is no affiliation, no worrying about pleasing funders. I have no reason whatsoever to take shortcuts because I'm fooling no one but myself.
/Fredrik