- #1
Im_not_asian
- 2
- 0
My first post here, so please humor me. I have found no one in my life who can explain this to me:
My question is about the base 10 number system. It arises from the rate at which new NAMES are attributed to numbers as they increase. To illustrate, please consider -
10 x 1 unit = 10. - This is significant as this is the point at which a new NAME is attributed to subsequent numbers (ie from units to tens)
10 x 10 = 100. (moving from tens to hundreds)
10 x 100 = 1000 (hundreds to thousands) - noting new names thus far have been attributed in accordance with multiples of 10
10 x 1000 = 10 000. - No new name..
Why this lack of continuity?
Why are new names given in accordance with multiples of 10 prior to reaching 1000, (or 10 000), and not after?
My question is about the base 10 number system. It arises from the rate at which new NAMES are attributed to numbers as they increase. To illustrate, please consider -
10 x 1 unit = 10. - This is significant as this is the point at which a new NAME is attributed to subsequent numbers (ie from units to tens)
10 x 10 = 100. (moving from tens to hundreds)
10 x 100 = 1000 (hundreds to thousands) - noting new names thus far have been attributed in accordance with multiples of 10
10 x 1000 = 10 000. - No new name..
Why this lack of continuity?
Why are new names given in accordance with multiples of 10 prior to reaching 1000, (or 10 000), and not after?