Evolution Theory: Incomplete Ideas

[b11ngoo]

Edit. My ideas are incomplete.

 

[Dissident Dan]

Huh?

Will anyone join me for a big "WTF?!"?

 

[FZ+]

WTF??

 

[russ_watters]

Yes, but what kind of cookies?

MMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmm. Coooookies.

 

[Evo]

Ok, I was going to ask WTF? But I thought maybe he meant, in a very weird way, that we needed diversity to survive.

 

[Dissident Dan]

I think that (s)he's been infected by Doug Moon.

 

[the_truth]

Actually I think he meant we need to create points to survive. In otherwords we need to become a load of social darwinist spartans.

 

[Guybrush Threepwood]

Originally posted by russ_watters
Yes, but what kind of cookies?

maybe he means the Internet type cookies

 

[Guybrush Threepwood]

Originally posted by b11ngoo
Evolution exists by people living out their desire to eat cookies. It is the same for sex, or value of velvet paintings, etc...

sooo let me get this straight...
If I don't have sex I'll evolve?
What kind of evolution are you referring to?

 

[Deeviant]

Originally posted by b11ngoo
Unified evolution. The unity of 1 person who lives to drink health shakes, carve a totem, look at picture books. And of course have children. But evolution is unified by diversity, right now. Diversity in the points chosen, point I mean.

If I like to climb cliffs. My evolution of life will kill me if I fall. Evolution has happened.

Points chosen evolve the world through diversification. Diversication is dead with no point differing from another.

Points are not defined in geometry. So there is no one point to legally say is the point to be. Just points that are diversified is legally justifiable. Based on diversity needing points differing to diversify.

Lets see here...

Evolution is driven by natural selection, not geometry or ganja cookies. Points don't evolve, life does. Your right, people aren't defined by geometry? I like to climb cliffs and I have fallen a couple times yet evolution has not killed me(obviously).

The vocabulary of your "theory" needs to be more cleary defined, but in order for that to happen, you would probably have to know what you are talking about.

 

[Deeviant]

Originally posted by b11ngoo
So in other words. Evolution is without a unified meathod ? We exist by chaos greater than predicted because of that, a natural selection chaos.

And geometry is nonsense. Natural selection proves it to be so.

And your strong. You have fallen down and survived.

I got what you were saying right ?

First, define a "unified method" and tell me why evolution should/does follow your "unified method". Secondly, provide some sort of geometrical proof of what you say, you can't just say "this is true because of geometry!" you must actually show data or mathemetical evidence that supports your theory.

I am pretty strong though, I've got a hard head too.

 

[Deeviant]

Originally posted by b11ngoo
You want a formula I take it. One that uses points, geometric points and defines a unified meathod.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?threadid=15882

Please refer to that link. If you would be so kind as to dispute and destroy that formula. I would like you to do that. Please.

I used such meathod to explain that evolution uses the point as well.

Well. Go on. Get wrecking my formula.

I have a most conclusive mathematical proof proving that your statement is false..

Alpha + beta - oranges = One happy monkey.

As you can see here, it is obvious that your statement is wrong. I would perhaps try a different angle if I were you.

 

[Deeviant]

Originally posted by b11ngoo
Bogus.

I hold that my postulate is just as valid as yours.