- #1
- 3,516
- 1,625
Sometimes a news story just isn't much of a news story without some serious spin.
In this case, the basic story is that EM emissions from the electronic circuitry on satellites is measurable from the Earth's surface and is likely to interfere with radio astronomy.
These EM emission are at low frequencies and very low power. They do not violate any EMC regulatory requirements. In fact, they don't really fall under the definitions of "EMI" or "Radiative Emissions" (although they are radiative emissions).
So, you might want to title such an article "Satellite EM emissions a problem for Radio Astronomy". But does that title really grab you?
How about this: "SpaceX's Starlink Satellites Are Leaking Radiation, Scientists Confirm"
Of course, you're thinking "Leaking Radiation", hmmm, electric shaver, laptop, auto ignition system, but certainly not Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima. Right?
In this case, the basic story is that EM emissions from the electronic circuitry on satellites is measurable from the Earth's surface and is likely to interfere with radio astronomy.
These EM emission are at low frequencies and very low power. They do not violate any EMC regulatory requirements. In fact, they don't really fall under the definitions of "EMI" or "Radiative Emissions" (although they are radiative emissions).
So, you might want to title such an article "Satellite EM emissions a problem for Radio Astronomy". But does that title really grab you?
How about this: "SpaceX's Starlink Satellites Are Leaking Radiation, Scientists Confirm"
Of course, you're thinking "Leaking Radiation", hmmm, electric shaver, laptop, auto ignition system, but certainly not Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima. Right?