- #1
Niles
- 1,866
- 0
Hi
In introductory atomic physics one usually goes through the classical derivation of the Zeeman effect, where one finds that an electron in a magnetic field can have three different kinds of motion: along the B-field with frequency ω and rotating CW/CCW with ω±Ω. Polarized photons can excite this motion, depending on their polarization.
OK, so the system I am thinking of can be descirbed by a coordinate system (x, y, z) satisfying the right-hand rule, where B || z, E || x and k || y (k is the propagation vector of the incident E-field). So the polarization is ortogonal to the quantization axis.
Looking down from +x to -x, circular electronic motion around B (i.e., σ±) looks linear. Is it correct to say that since this is the case, the incoming photons will excite this motion, and thus generate circularly polarized light?
Niles.
In introductory atomic physics one usually goes through the classical derivation of the Zeeman effect, where one finds that an electron in a magnetic field can have three different kinds of motion: along the B-field with frequency ω and rotating CW/CCW with ω±Ω. Polarized photons can excite this motion, depending on their polarization.
OK, so the system I am thinking of can be descirbed by a coordinate system (x, y, z) satisfying the right-hand rule, where B || z, E || x and k || y (k is the propagation vector of the incident E-field). So the polarization is ortogonal to the quantization axis.
Looking down from +x to -x, circular electronic motion around B (i.e., σ±) looks linear. Is it correct to say that since this is the case, the incoming photons will excite this motion, and thus generate circularly polarized light?
Niles.