- #1
Bacle
- 662
- 1
Hi, I saw a proof/argument done today that I think was wrong:
It is finding the limit as a->oo of the integral from 0 to b<oo:
Int_(0..b) Sqr[x(1 +cos(ax))]dx , where Sqr is the square root
Now, the argument given was that one could find a bound for the oscillation
of (1+cos(ax)).
The problem I have is that, no matter what the trick may be, cos(ax) will take
values of 1 , and of -1 (at 2kPi and 2(k+1)Pi respectively; k an integer), so that
the value of the limit will go from:
i) 0 , when cos(ax)=-1 , to:
ii) Int_
(0..b) Sqr[2x]dx =(Sqr2)x^(-1/2), which is an improper integral at x=0, but does not
go to zero.
So the limit does _not_ exist, right?
It is finding the limit as a->oo of the integral from 0 to b<oo:
Int_(0..b) Sqr[x(1 +cos(ax))]dx , where Sqr is the square root
Now, the argument given was that one could find a bound for the oscillation
of (1+cos(ax)).
The problem I have is that, no matter what the trick may be, cos(ax) will take
values of 1 , and of -1 (at 2kPi and 2(k+1)Pi respectively; k an integer), so that
the value of the limit will go from:
i) 0 , when cos(ax)=-1 , to:
ii) Int_
(0..b) Sqr[2x]dx =(Sqr2)x^(-1/2), which is an improper integral at x=0, but does not
go to zero.
So the limit does _not_ exist, right?