Expanding and Substituting: Solving (1-3x)^{\frac{1}{3}}

  • Thread starter Thread starter thereddevils
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expanding
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on expanding the expression (1-3x)^{\frac{1}{3}} in ascending powers of x up to x^3, yielding the expansion 1 - x - x^2 - (5/3)x^3, valid for |-3x| < 1/3. Participants explore appropriate substitutions for x to derive the cube root of 3, suggesting that setting 1 - 3x equal to 3 may help in solving for x. There is a debate on the validity of the substitution method, with suggestions to use fractions like 3/8 or 3/27. However, confusion arises regarding the result of 33809/19683, which some believe is closer to the square root of 3 rather than the cube root. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in finding suitable substitutions for such expansions.
thereddevils
Messages
436
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Expand (1-3x)^{\frac{1}{3}} in ascending power of x , up to the term x^3 . By using an appropriate substitution for x , show that \sqrt[3]3=\frac{33809}{19683}



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



the expansion would be 1-x-x^2-(5/3)x^3 and the range of x whixh make this expansion valid is |-3x|<1/3 .

My question is how do i find this appropriate substitution for x ? Instead the guessing way , is there a proper way ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, since you have (1- 3x)^{1/3} and want (3)^{1/3} you probably want to make 1- 3x= 3. Solve that for x.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Well, since you have (1- 3x)^{1/3} and want (3)^{1/3} you probably want to make 1- 3x= 3. Solve that for x.

i don think so because -1/3<x<1/3 for this expansion to be valid .
 
Hi thereddevils

Maybe this method can be applied. Since we want to find the cube root and the range for x is -1/3<x<1/3 , we can deduce that (1-3x) should be fraction.

So, the denominator should be a number that is integer and has a cube root, which is also integer , such as 8, 27, etc

Now we can try (1-3x) = 3/8 or (1-3x) = 3/27 , etc..

But cube root of 3 is not 33809 / 19683.
33809 / 19683 is closer to square root of 3. Maybe you can re-check the question :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K