MHB Expanding Brackets: Math Help for 2nd Term Maths

  • Thread starter Thread starter raechelc93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expanding
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around expanding the expression \( (p-q+r^2)(3-(p^2+q^2)) \). The initial confusion stems from the presence of double brackets, but it is clarified that the expression can be simplified by distributing each term in the first bracket across the second. The correct interpretation of the second bracket is confirmed as \( (3-p^2-q^2) \), which is equivalent to \( 3 - (p^2 + q^2) \). The process involves recognizing that multiplying by -1 distributes across the terms in the parentheses. Ultimately, the user resolves their confusion and understands the distribution process involved in expanding the expression.
raechelc93
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I am currently doing an Ext Math 1 subject and haven't really come across any issues when needing to expand brackets, however, have come across the below equation I can't quite figure out... Any help would be greatly appreciated!

\( (p-q+r^2)(3-(p^2+q^2)) \)

The double brackets as well as the 3rd term in the first set of brackets has got me very confused and I can't seem to figure out how to even start with this one.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
you’ve posted an expression, not an equation (there is no equal sign)

$(p-q+r^2)(3-p^2-q^2)$

to expand, distribute the $p$, then the $-q$, and finally the $r^2$ to the three terms in the second set of parentheses ...

$3p-p^3-pq^2 -3q + p^2q +q^3 +3r^2 -p^2r^2 -q^2r^2$

note the expanded expression is less “simplified” than the original factored expression ... expanding doesn’t always yield a better representation
 
Hi Skeeter,

Thanks for responding so quick! There are 2 sets of brackets within the second set though.. \[ (3-(p^2+q^2)) \] would it still be the same process if this is the case?

It looks like you altered the second set of brackets from the orignal to get \[ (3-p^2-q^2) \] - how/why did you change it?
 
Nevermind - I just figured it out :)
 
$-(p^2+ q^2)$ is the same as $(-1)(p^2+ q^2)$ so we are multiplying $p^2+ q^2$ by -1. Using the fact that "multiplication distributes over addition", that is $(-1)(p^2)+ (-1)(q^2)= -p^2+ (-q^2)= -p^2- q^2$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top