Expanding Powers of 1/R - Modern Quantum Mechanics by JJ Sakurai

  • Thread starter Master J
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Expansion
In summary: I hope this helps.In summary, the conversation discusses how to expand the expression 1/r1 + 1/|R+r2-r1| - 1/|R+r2| - 1/|R-r1| in powers of 1/R. The solution involves using Taylor series to expand each term and combining them to get the result (1/R^3)(x1x2 + y1y2 - z1z2). There is also a discussion on the limitations of the expansion and how to handle cases where R<0.
  • #1
Master J
226
0
Expansion in Powers...

I wish to expand the following in powers of 1/R :


1/r1 + 1/ |R+r2-r1| - 1/ |R+r2| - 1/ |R-r1|


Each r is a vector with x,y,z components indexed as x1,y1 etc. R lies on the z axis so x and y components.

In Modern Quantum Mechanics by JJ Sakurai, equation 5.3.40 is the required result, yet I cannot obtain it. Is it simply Taylor expansion? Id really appreciate if someone could perhaps go thru this with me, as I encounter expansions like this all the time and never really know where to start.

The result is (1/R^3) . (x1x2 +y1y2 - z1z2)

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


You want a Taylor series in terms of 1/R. Note that this Taylor series will blow up if R = r1 or R=-r2 or R=r1-r2, which all generate divide by zeroes in the original expression. The series works best for huge |R| - i.e. R is far away from r1, and -r2 - which leads to a quickly converging series.

And I think you meant 1/|R| for the first term in your expression. That way, for huge |R|, the signs will end up cancelling any 1/R's left over in the result. Otherwise there is no possibility of 1/R^3 being the first nonzero Taylor series term!

f(R) = 1/|R| + 1/ |R+r2-r1| - 1/ |R+r2| - 1/ |R-r1|

I'll work on the problem assuming R > 0 since this is difficult to write :(

Each term can be expanded out in terms of R similar to how you can expand (1+x)^p = 1 + px + p(p-1)x^2/2 +...:

1/|R| = 1/R
1/|R+r2-r1| = 1/sqrt(R*R + (r2-r1)*(r2-r1) + 2R*(r2z-r1z))
=1/R * (1+(r2-r1)*(r2-r1)/R^2+2(r2z-r1z)/R)^(-1/2)=1/R - ((r2-r1)*(r2-r1)/R^2+2(r2z-r1z)/R)/(2R) + ...
1/|R+r2| = 1/R - (r2*r2/R^2+2r2z/R)/(2R) + ...
1/ |R-r1| = 1/R - (r1*r1/R^2-2r1z/R)/(2R) + ...

combining, you get
f(R) = 1/R + 1/R - ((r2-r1)*(r2-r1)/R^2+2(r2z-r1z)/R)/(2R) + ...
- 1/R + (r2*r2/R^2+2r2z/R)/(2R) + ...
- 1/R + (r1*r1/R^2-2r1z/R)/(2R) + ...

the 1/R's cancel out to get
f(R) = 1/(2R) [- ((r2-r1)*(r2-r1)/R^2+2(r2z-r1z)/R) + ...
(r2*r2/R^2+2r2z/R) + ...
+ (r1*r1/R^2-2r1z/R) + ...]

The effectively 1/R^2 terms cancel as well leaving 1/R^3 terms:
f(R) = 1/(2R) [- ((r2-r1)*(r2-r1)/R^2) + r2*r2/R^2 + (r1*r1/R^2 + ...]
= 1/(2R^3) [- (r2-r1)*(r2-r1) + r2*r2 + r1*r1+ ...]
= 1/(2R^3) [2r2r1]
=(r2 dot r1)/R^3

Um.. this isn't quite the result you expected but it's very close. I think if you expand the (1+x)^(-1/2) power series above one further term you'll get an additional 1/R^3 contribution and the right result.

Hope this helps.

Edit: BTW the case with R < 0 is easy to handle. If R < 0, then you can perform the transformation R->-R, r1->-r2, r2->-r1 to get to the above problem with R > 0, use the above solution, and then transform back (which leaves the above solution unchanged). Thus you can see the same solution solves the R < 0 case.
 
Last edited:
  • #3


I cannot thank you enough for expanding that out for me, it was hard work!


Yes, its 1/R, that was a typo. Thanks again, I am extremely greatful!


Now, I understand expansions, but I don't get the "in powers of R" part...what does this entail exactly?
 
Last edited:
  • #4


I guess I'm stuck at the first part...


Rite, so for example, 1/ | R-r1| is equal to ( R - r1 )^(-1/2), ie. just the length of the vector.

So then I have to expand this out in terms of R right? How do I do this? I can use Taylor series for expanding out differentiable functions around a point, but I just don't see how one applies it here?
 
  • #5


>"in powers of R" part...

I'm not sure what you are asking exactly.

If you use a one-dimensional equivalent to your original problem, it of course becomes much easier:
f(R) = 1/R + 1/ (R+r2-r1) - 1/(R+r2) - 1/(R-r1)

You can use the geometric series to do this expansion. The idea is that (1+x+x^2+x^3+...) * (1-x) = 1. Try mutliplying these yourself and you'll see all the terms drop out except for 1. Thus 1/(1-x) = 1 + x + x^2 + x^3 + ...
And negating x yields 1/(1+x) = 1 - x + x^2 - x^3 + ...

Then expanding each of the four terms, we have
f(R) = 1/R * (1 + 1/ (1+(r2-r1)/R) - 1/(1+r2/R) - 1/(1-r1/R))
= 1/R * [
1 +
1 - (r2-r1)/R + (r2-r1)^2/R^2 - (r2-r1)^3/R^3 + ...
-1 + r2/R + r2^2/R^2 - r2^3/R^3 + ...
-1 - r1/R - r1^2/R^2 - r1^3/R^3 -...
]

and summing all these terms you can see how the expression expands as powers of 1/R: the powers R^-1, R^-2, etc.

Since you are using the vector magnitude (|| symbol), which involves a square root, you can't use the easy technique above based on 1/(1-x). You instead must contend with (1-x)^(-1/2).

Fortunately, there is a Taylor series expansion for (1+x)^p where p is any number. It is 1 + px + p(p-1)x^2/2! + p(p-1)(p-2)x^3/3! + ... That's what I used above, although I only computed it for a couple of terms and not long enough to get the full 1/R^3 result.
You can see that my expansion for (1+x)^p is correct because if you differentiate it, it has the same result as multiplying by p/(1+x).
 
  • #6


>( R - r1 )^(-1/2), ie. just the length of the vector.
>So then I have to expand this out in terms of R right?

You're missing a square there.
It's really ((R - r1)^2) ^ (-1/2) = (RxRx+RyRy+RzRz + r1xr1x + r1yr1y+r1zr1z - 2Rxr1x - 2Ryr1y - 2Rzr1z)^(-1/2)
Since we have Rx=Ry=0 and we're just calling R=Rz, it is
(RR + r1xr1x + r1yr1y-r1zr1z - 2Rzr1z)^(-1/2)
Assume R > 0, then it's
=(1/R) * (1 + r1xr1x/R^2 + r1yr1y-r1zr1z/R^2 - 2zr1z/R)^(-1/2)
We now have something in the form of (1+x)^p = 1 +px +p(p-1)x^2/2 + ...
Unfortunately the x in the case contains powers of 1/R and 1/R^2. Which means computing x^2 and higher powers of x will have a few terms. But it can still be done.
 

FAQ: Expanding Powers of 1/R - Modern Quantum Mechanics by JJ Sakurai

What is the significance of the 1/R potential in modern quantum mechanics?

The 1/R potential, also known as the Coulomb potential, plays a crucial role in modern quantum mechanics as it describes the interaction between charged particles. It is a fundamental component of the Schrodinger equation, which is used to study the behavior of quantum systems.

How does the 1/R potential affect the energy levels of a quantum system?

The 1/R potential is a central force potential, meaning that it only depends on the distance between the interacting particles. This leads to a specific form of the Schrodinger equation, which results in energy levels that are inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the particles, known as the Rydberg formula.

Can the 1/R potential be used to describe all interactions in quantum mechanics?

No, the 1/R potential is only applicable to systems that involve charged particles. Other types of interactions, such as the strong and weak nuclear forces, require different potential functions to accurately describe their behavior.

How does the 1/R potential relate to the concept of angular momentum in quantum mechanics?

The 1/R potential is a spherically symmetric potential, meaning that it does not depend on the direction of the particles' motion. This leads to the conservation of angular momentum in quantum systems, as the potential does not change with the orientation of the particles.

What are the limitations of using the 1/R potential in modern quantum mechanics?

While the 1/R potential is a useful tool for studying the behavior of charged particles, it has some limitations. For example, it does not take into account the effects of relativity, which can become significant at high energies. Additionally, it does not accurately describe the behavior of particles at very small distances, where quantum field theory is needed.

Back
Top