Expansion at first order in QCD counterterm

In summary, the conversation discusses the meaning of the expansion at first order in ##\delta_2## and ##\delta_3## at the second step in the last line. These quantities are not "small" and the entire point is to take the ##\epsilon \to 0## limit and the counterterms blow up. The Dyson series is an expansion in the coupling constant ##g##, and the 2nd-order loop corrections to the quark and gluon self-energies, as well as the gluon 3-vertex, are used to determine the counter terms for ##Z_1##, ##Z_2##, and ##Z_3##. This leads to the determination of ##Z_g
  • #1
Siupa
29
5


What is the meaning of the expansion at first order in ##\delta_2## and ##\delta_3## at the second step in the last line? These quantities are not "small" - on the contrary, the entire point is to then take the ##\epsilon \to 0## limit and the counterterms blow up
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I can't read light gray on a less light gray background. Can you use LaTex and maybe post your source?
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and berkeman
  • #3
The Dyson series is an expansion in the coupling constant ##g##. Obviously you are evaluating the quoted 2nd-order loop corrections to the quark and gluon self-energies as well as the gluon 3-vertex to get the counter terms to evaluate ##Z_1##, ##Z_2##, and ##Z_3##, from which ##Z_g## follows through a Slavnov-Taylor identity (which maybe is Eq. (75), which you didn't quote). Of course since you have the said ##Z##-factors only to order ##g^2## (or order ##\alpha_s=g^2/(4 \pi)##), you can determine only the counterterm contributing to ##Z_g## to this order, and thus you have to expand the expression for it also up to order ##\alpha_s##.

In the here obviously applied minimal-subtraction scheme you need to find the coefficients to ##1/\epsilon## order by order perturbation theory. This determines the counter terms order by order. At higher loop order you have to take care of the subdivergences by using the corresponding counter terms of subdiagrams.
 
  • Like
Likes Siupa and topsquark
  • #4
Vanadium 50 said:
I can't read light gray on a less light gray background. Can you use LaTex and maybe post your source?
If you open the imgur link it should be in high res. Anyways the reference is chapter 3, end of subchapter 3.3 of this pdf
 
  • #5
vanhees71 said:
The Dyson series is an expansion in the coupling constant ##g##. Obviously you are evaluating the quoted 2nd-order loop corrections to the quark and gluon self-energies as well as the gluon 3-vertex to get the counter terms to evaluate ##Z_1##, ##Z_2##, and ##Z_3##, from which ##Z_g## follows through a Slavnov-Taylor identity (which maybe is Eq. (75), which you didn't quote). Of course since you have the said ##Z##-factors only to order ##g^2## (or order ##\alpha_s=g^2/(4 \pi)##), you can determine only the counterterm contributing to ##Z_g## to this order, and thus you have to expand the expression for it also up to order ##\alpha_s##.

In the here obviously applied minimal-subtraction scheme you need to find the coefficients to ##1/\epsilon## order by order perturbation theory. This determines the counter terms order by order. At higher loop order you have to take care of the subdivergences by using the corresponding counter terms of subdiagrams.
Eq. (75) is just the definition of ##Z_1 = Z_g Z_2 Z_3^{\frac{1}{2}}##. Anyways thank you I understand now, the expansions of ##1/Z_2## , ##1/Z_3## are obviously at first order in ##\alpha_s##, which in turn means first order in the counterterms since they are proportional to ##\alpha_s## because they were computed at 1-loop. I guess the divergence in ##1/\epsilon## doesn't matter since we only take the limit ##\epsilon \to 0## in the end?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #6
Right! That's the idea!
 
  • Love
Likes malawi_glenn

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top