Expectation value of an operator to the power of n

Simplifying will give you the desired result.Hi all"How do I prove that <A^n>=<A>^n? It seems intuitive but how do I rigorously prove it?" The user provides their attempt at a proof, but it is only rigorous enough when the wavefunction is an eigenstate of A with eigenvalue λ. However, a counterexample is given for n=2 to show that the variance is not necessarily zero. The user is advised to use the Binomial Theorem to derive a general expression for <A^n>-<A>^n.
  • #1
patric44
308
40
Homework Statement
prove that : <A^n>=<A>^n
Relevant Equations
<A^n>=<A>^n
hi all
how do I prove that
$$
<A^{n}>=<A>^{n}
$$
It seems intuitive but how do I rigorously prove it, My attempt was like , the LHS can be written as:
$$
\bra{\Psi}\hat{A}.\hat{A}.\hat{A}...\ket{\Psi}=\lambda^{n} \bra{\Psi}\ket{\Psi}=\lambda^{n}\delta_{ii}=\lambda^{n}
$$
and the RHS equal:
$$
<A>^{n}=[\bra{\Psi}A\ket{\Psi}]^{n}=\lambda^{n}[\bra{\Psi}\ket{\Psi}]^{n}=\lambda^{n}[\delta_{ii}]^{n}=\lambda^{n}
$$
Is my proof rigurus enough or there are other formal proof for that
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A counter example. For ground state of a partricle in a box [-a,a],
<x>=0 but [tex] <x^2> \ \ >\ \ <x>^2=0 [/tex]

Your proof seems to be all right only when ##\Psi## is an eigenstate of A with eigenvalue ##\lambda##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
  • #3
patric44 said:
Homework Statement: prove that : <A^n>=<A>^n
Note that for ##n = 2##, the variance is not necessarily zero:
$$\sigma^2(A) =\langle A^2 \rangle - \langle A \rangle^2 \ne 0$$In general, you can derive an expression for ##\langle A^n \rangle - \langle A \rangle^n## by starting with:
$$\langle[A - \langle A \rangle]^n \rangle$$And expanding using the Binomial Theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and malawi_glenn

FAQ: Expectation value of an operator to the power of n

What is the expectation value of an operator to the power of n?

The expectation value of an operator to the power of n, denoted as ⟨ψ|Â^n|ψ⟩, is the average value obtained when measuring the observable associated with the operator  raised to the power of n in the state |ψ⟩. It is computed as the inner product of the state |ψ⟩ with the operator Â^n acting on the state |ψ⟩.

How do you calculate the expectation value of an operator to the power of n?

To calculate the expectation value of an operator  to the power of n, you first apply the operator Â^n to the state |ψ⟩, and then take the inner product of the resulting state with |ψ⟩. Mathematically, it is expressed as ⟨ψ|Â^n|ψ⟩. This involves matrix multiplication if  is represented as a matrix and |ψ⟩ as a vector.

Why is the expectation value of an operator to the power of n important?

The expectation value of an operator to the power of n is important because it provides insights into higher-order moments and the distribution of measurement outcomes for the observable associated with the operator Â. This can be useful in understanding the variance, skewness, and other statistical properties of the observable.

Can the expectation value of an operator to the power of n be a complex number?

The expectation value of an operator to the power of n is generally a real number if the operator  is Hermitian, as Hermitian operators correspond to observable physical quantities. However, for non-Hermitian operators, the expectation value can be complex.

How does the expectation value of an operator to the power of n relate to quantum mechanics?

In quantum mechanics, the expectation value of an operator to the power of n provides information about the probable outcomes and statistical properties of measurements of the associated observable. It is a fundamental concept used to predict the behavior of quantum systems and to understand the dynamics and properties of quantum states.

Back
Top