MHB Expected Value of Cup of Coffee in Flip a Lid Contest

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the expected value of a cup of coffee in a promotional contest by a coffee chain. Participants analyze the probabilities of winning various prizes, including free coffees, TVs, a snowmobile, and a sports car, against the cost of purchasing the coffee. The expected value calculations reveal a negative outcome, approximately -$1.37, indicating that customers may lose money on average by participating. The importance of accounting for the purchase price of the coffee is emphasized in the calculations. Overall, the expected value analysis suggests that the contest may not be financially beneficial for customers.
Istar
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In its flip a lid contest, a coffee chain offers prizes of 50,000 free coffees, each worth \$1.50; two new TVs, each worth \$1200; a snowmobile worth \$15 000; and sports car worth \$35 000. A total of 1 000 000 promotional coffee cups have been printed for contest. Coffee sells for \$1.50 per cup. What is the expected value of cup of coffee to the customer?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB! :)

To begin, we need to determine the probabilities for the following events:
  • Customer who bought a cup of coffee, purchased a cup of coffee (this is certain, thus probability is 1)
  • Customer won a free coffee
  • Customer won TV
  • Customer won snowmobile
  • Customer won sports car
Once we've determined these probabilities, we can associate the net loss/gain for each event and compute the sum of the products of the probabilities and loss/gain for all events to determine the expected value. What do you get for the probabilities of the events?
 
Thank you for your welcome,

This is how I did it :

X
P(X=x)
50000/1000000
1.5​
2/1000000
1200​
1/1000000
15000​
1/1000000
35000​
Expected mean value [x] = {x(Px)} =

(0.05x1.5) + (0.000002x1200) + (0.000001x15000) + (0.000001x35000) =

(.075) + (0.0024) + (0.015) + (0.035) = 0.1274

I am not sure if it right !
 
I would write:

$$E[X]=1(-1.5)+\frac{50000}{1000000}(1.5)+\frac{2}{1000000}(1200)+\frac{1}{1000000}(15000)+\frac{1}{1000000}(35000)=-\frac{6863}{5000}\approx-1.37$$

You have neglected the certainty that they will spend \$1.50 to purchase the cup of coffee.

Another way to approach this it to observe there are 949996 non-winning cups and write:

$$E[X]=\frac{949996}{1000000}(0-1.5)+\frac{50000}{1000000}(1.5-1.5)+\frac{2}{1000000}(1200-1.5)+\frac{1}{1000000}(15000-1.5)+\frac{1}{1000000}(35000-1.5)=-\frac{6863}{5000}\approx-1.37$$

As you can see this is mathematically equivalent to the way I initially approached the problem.
 
Thank you very much ... I guess I was overthinking with the rest of the probability and neglected that. The table blindsided me. Thx again
 
Istar said:
Thank you very much ... I guess I was overthinking with the rest of the probability and neglected that. The table blindsided me. Thx again

Other than overlooking the purchase price of the cup of coffee, your table and resulting calculations were good. (Yes)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top