I Explaining the Bloch-Siegert Shift - A Beginner's Guide

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Malamala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shift
Malamala
Messages
345
Reaction score
28
Hello! Can someone explain to me or point me towards a basic explanation of the Bloch-Siegert shift (even the Wikipedia explanation is not clear to me)? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Malamala said:
Hello! Can someone explain to me or point me towards a basic explanation of the Bloch-Siegert shift (even the Wikipedia explanation is not clear to me)? Thank you!
Anyone, please?
 
A. Neumaier said:
So from what I understand, in RWA we ignore the fast rotating frequency and doing so we get the actual resonant frequency of the system ##\omega_0##. If we account for the fast rotating term, we basically have 2 laser lights interacting with the system, and the fast rotating one is shifting the levels that the slow rotating one is seeing, such that the measured frequency is shifted from ##\omega_0##. I am not sure I understand how they go from the rotating frame (where they get these shifts), to the lab frame (where we actually measure them). Are the shifts the same in both frames (actually there seem to be 3 frames involved in this analysis)? What confuses me even more is how can the shift be a constant in time (##\frac{1}{4}\frac{\Omega_0^2}{\omega_0}##), given that the field is time varying?
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top