Explore the Science of Sci-Fi: Relativity, Chaos & Superstring Theories

In summary, this is a website that discusses the real science behind popular science fiction stories. It includes a brief introduction to relativity, chaos, and superstring theories, as well as other science concepts. Ivan, the author, sends the site to another user who is tired of trying to get technical. The user finds Astronuc's homepage which redirects them to this thread. There are a number of questions about alternative energy that the user wants to answer before the week is over. There is also a trivia question about the only science fiction movie to win an Oscar.
  • #36
Moonbear said:
(I keep having images of that Home Improvement episode where they remodeled the bathroom popping into my mind when I think about bringing fixtures in through windows)
I used to belong to the Experimental Aircraft Association. One of our members didn't have a garage, so he built his aeroplane in the basement. Guess what he forgot... :rolleyes: :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Ivan Seeking said:
I know. I checked and it appears that at least one of the listed owners is a retired physics professor.

So he's a retired crackpot
 
  • #38
Danger said:
I used to belong to the Experimental Aircraft Association. One of our members didn't have a garage, so he built his aeroplane in the basement. Guess what he forgot... :rolleyes: :biggrin:

His towel?
 
  • #39
The_Professional said:
So he's a retired crackpot

I didn't see anything that looked offensive. Did you?

Also, I have to wonder, who are you to call him a crackpot?
 
  • #40
Ivan Seeking said:
I didn't see anything that looked offensive. Did you?

Also, I have to wonder, who are you to call him a crackpot?

I was just kidding. If I put the smilie face after then that would ruin it
 
  • #41
The_Professional said:
I was just kidding. If I put the smilie face after then that would ruin it

Sorry, :redface: I seem to be incapable of sorting our who's joking and who's not lately.
 
  • #42
Ivan Seeking said:
Sorry, :redface: I seem to be incapable of sorting our who's joking and who's not lately.

It was too dry of a joke to get. I have a lot of respect for physicists and scientists.
 
  • #43
Huckleberry said:
His towel?
You're beginning to worry me, lad... :-p

Ivan Seeking said:
I seem to be incapable of sorting our who's joking and who's not lately.
I never joke. I like to put lots of smilies on my posts so people will think that I have a sense of humour. :biggrin:
Like that.
 
  • #44
Skinny, aliens naturally have a different sense of humor than us humans. Must be that anti-gravity belt they wear on earth..
 
  • #45
The_Professional said:
Skinny, aliens naturally have a different sense of humor than us humans. Must be that anti-gravity belt they wear on earth..
Slender, respected Sir, Slender. Skinny is my second cousin three times removed on my neighbour's side of the family. (He was killed trying to get back in the fourth time.)
 
  • #46
Ivan Seeking said:
What gets me is how accomplished scientists, especially from NASA, will cite shows like Star Trek [in particular] as an inspiration for their career. There is one scientist that I saw interviewed recently. I don't know his name but he led one of the deep space efforts that used ion propulsion. He can still cite the dialogue from the ST episode that introduced him to the IP concept.

Well, being inspired and being educated are complementary but very different things. I really want a show to do both.

I know the scientist you're talking about. He worked on the Deep Space 1 probe, and he uses that quote from Star Trek to introduce the probe's ion drive. Spock said something like, "Captain, unknown alien ship ahead, detecting ion drive... very advanced technology." It's an amusingly ironic anecdote, because here we have an actual ion drive, and it's not at all like Star Trek, but it's still really cool.

I just want to see some sci-fi that is more down to this universe. :frown:

How many shows have to come and go before one actually gets serious about language barriers? What's so fun about watching a fake super-genius learn a language in a couple minutes? Are people turned off by the nitty gritty? I don't think so. There are ways to make it fun, interesting, and genuinely educational.

It'd probably have to be an entirely new genre.

Social science fiction. :smile:
 
  • #47
Telos said:
How many shows have to come and go before one actually gets serious about language barriers?
The Universal Translator from Trek surely must be the most amazing device ever created. It even works for deaf people. Notice how it alters everyone's facial movements so that they can lip-read in English.
 
  • #48
And don't forget the babblefish from HGTTG!

Danger said:
"What's the only science fiction movie in history to win an Oscar for best actor? HINT: It's based upon a novella that became a book before being filmed.)

Is it Cliff Robertson from Charly?
 
  • #49
Huckleberry said:
Is it Cliff Robertson from Charly?
Since only 2 of you answered, (and 1 cheated :-p ) I'll declare you winners. I should have known better than to ask it here. No one, and I do mean absolutely no one outside of the SF/Science community acknowledges that Charly was science fiction. I bet you'll find it in the mainstream drama section of your local video place.
 
  • #50
Danger said:
Since only 2 of you answered, (and 1 cheated :-p ) I'll declare you winners. I should have known better than to ask it here. No one, and I do mean absolutely no one outside of the SF/Science community acknowledges that Charly was science fiction. I bet you'll find it in the mainstream drama section of your local video place.

That despite the fact that Flowers for Algernon won Daniel Keyes both the Hugo in 1959 for the Short story and the Nebula in 1966 for the Novel.
 
  • #51
Telos said:
Well, being inspired and being educated are complementary but very different things. I really want a show to do both.

I know the scientist you're talking about. He worked on the Deep Space 1 probe, and he uses that quote from Star Trek to introduce the probe's ion drive. Spock said something like, "Captain, unknown alien ship ahead, detecting ion drive... very advanced technology." It's an amusingly ironic anecdote, because here we have an actual ion drive, and it's not at all like Star Trek, but it's still really cool.

Yes, he mentioned that in the interview that I saw. I forget what year ST1 was supposed to be taking place...2650 or something? And the aliens were waaaaaaaayyyy ahead of us; "aye, Captain, they could teach us a thing or two".

I just want to see some sci-fi that is more down to this universe. :frown:

How many shows have to come and go before one actually gets serious about language barriers? What's so fun about watching a fake super-genius learn a language in a couple minutes? Are people turned off by the nitty gritty? I don't think so. There are ways to make it fun, interesting, and genuinely educational.

It'd probably have to be an entirely new genre.

Social science fiction. :smile:

I see good Sci-Fi, even TV and movies, as a gateway drug to real science. Also, at least for me, the inspirational part of Sci-Fi comes from what might be possible, not just what is or will be possible. Even so, I completely understand what you mean. I have always gravitated towards the most plausible Sci-Fi, and make fun of the silliness in all of the bad stuff I now watch. Tsu [my wife] hates it when I pick thing apart. :biggrin: But I love the stuff so much that I even watched A Boy and His Dog!

Anyway, a fifth time viewing of a bad Star Trek re-run is still better than the best episode of Friends. :biggrin: But it's pretty tough to even approach the level of a good SF novel with a movie or TV program. I think a good novel can do justice to the science of SF.
 
  • #52
Danger said:
Since only 2 of you answered, (and 1 cheated :-p ) I'll declare you winners. I should have known better than to ask it here. No one, and I do mean absolutely no one outside of the SF/Science community acknowledges that Charly was science fiction. I bet you'll find it in the mainstream drama section of your local video place.
Danger said:
You're not allowed to Google during a game of 'Trivial Pursuit'.
I did guess. And then I got curious.

One day people will have microchips implanted in their heads and we will be able to google anytime we like. Images sent directly to the brain will teach children how to read and write. Grades K-12 installed and learned. Hmm, then again people would probably use it to record all their favorite game show and soap channels and watch them without having to open their eyes in the morning. They might never learn anything.
 
  • #53
Janus said:
That despite the fact that Flowers for Algernon won Daniel Keyes both the Hugo in 1959 for the Short story and the Nebula in 1966 for the Novel.
I read the short story when I was about 14 and it just blew me away. When I tried to find it again, I ran into the novel. It was just as good, but different. Then the movie... I would have sworn that it was an unfilmable story, but they did an awesome job of it.

Ivan Seeking said:
I forget what year ST1 was supposed to be taking place...2650 or something?
I believe it was the 2200's.

Ivan Seeking said:
But I love the stuff so much that I even watched A Boy and His Dog!
Try the original short story by Harlan Ellison: "Blood Was a Rover".
 
  • #54
Danger said:
I read the short story when I was about 14 and it just blew me away. When I tried to find it again, I ran into the novel. It was just as good, but different. Then the movie... I would have sworn that it was an unfilmable story, but they did an awesome job of it.


I believe it was the 2200's.


Try the original short story by Harlan Ellison: "Blood Was a Rover".

Danger, you seem to have a good grasp of the the SF genre, so I was wondering, what are your thoughts on Lime Jello?
 
  • #55
Janus said:
Danger, you seem to have a good grasp of the the SF genre, so I was wondering, what are your thoughts on Lime Jello?
Good lubricant, but doesn't go well with fish.
Sorry, I don't get the reference. I've read quite a bit of SF, and consider myself a fan, but I'm not obsessive about it. I belonged to a club in Calgary about 20 years ago for quite a while, primarily because the conversations were much like here in GD. If you tell me where it's from, I might remember having read it. :smile:
 
  • #56
Danger said:
Good lubricant, but doesn't go well with fish.
Sorry, I don't get the reference. I've read quite a bit of SF, and consider myself a fan, but I'm not obsessive about it. I belonged to a club in Calgary about 20 years ago for quite a while, primarily because the conversations were much like here in GD. If you tell me where it's from, I might remember having read it. :smile:

Its not a literary reference, it was just my round-about way of asking if you ever got into active Fandom (as in attending Sf conventions). Lime Jello is a reference to a legendary story of an event in Con history.
 
  • #57
Janus said:
Its not a literary reference, it was just my round-about way of asking if you ever got into active Fandom (as in attending Sf conventions). Lime Jello is a reference to a legendary story of an event in Con history.
I was Security Chief for Non-Con 4, the first convention ever held in Calgary. It was my club that put it on. There were 2 or 3 more Non-Cons, which I worked Security for but didn't want Chiefdom again, then it became Con-Version. I don't even know 95% of the people in charge any more, and haven't attended one in over 10 years. I spent all my time in the con suite or the huckster's room anyhow, so I'm only missing some old friendships that were casual to start with. Sounds like you're a bit deeper into it. :smile:
 
  • #58
Danger said:
I was Security Chief for Non-Con 4, the first convention ever held in Calgary. It was my club that put it on. There were 2 or 3 more Non-Cons, which I worked Security for but didn't want Chiefdom again, then it became Con-Version. I don't even know 95% of the people in charge any more, and haven't attended one in over 10 years. I spent all my time in the con suite or the huckster's room anyhow, so I'm only missing some old friendships that were casual to start with. Sounds like you're a bit deeper into it. :smile:

Not much any more. Its been a good 15 yrs since I've attended one. I attended quite a few Orycons (held here in Portland), and Norwescons (in Seattle). I made one Viking Con up in Bellingham WA. (Viking Con was thrown to raise money in order to keep the Viking Mars missions running.) I even made a Westercon the year it was held in Portland.

I actually met my wife at the first Norwescon I went to ( it was her first too). Other good memories from those times; Sitting in on a bull session with Poul Anderson in the Hospitality Suite at Viking Con. Creeping out the Mundanes as you walked into the elevator in full costume.:devil:

Once my daughter was born it became harder to get away for cons and we just sort of drifted away.
 
  • #59
Janus said:
Not much any more. Its been a good 15 yrs since I've attended one. I attended quite a few Orycons (held here in Portland), and Norwescons (in Seattle). I made one Viking Con up in Bellingham WA. (Viking Con was thrown to raise money in order to keep the Viking Mars missions running.) I even made a Westercon the year it was held in Portland.
There's a pretty good chance that you might know a few of the people from my club (DEC). I'm not going to mention any names in a public forum, but I'll PM them to you. They used to make the trips to the western regional cons in Seattle, California, etc.. If you ever saw a mermaid riding on the back of a centaur in the costume contest, those were a couple of ours.
 
Back
Top