Explore the World of Mathematics with These Must-Read Books

In summary, In summary, buying all four of these books may not be the best idea because it may be difficult to read them all at the same time and they might end up on a shelf.
  • #36
Thanks a lot for the info guys. I had looked into Hoffman, seems very good, and has excellent ratings. I am convinced in Spivak, but I'm weighing out Apostol and Courant. Tell me, if you know, which one between Courant and Apostol provides the most practice/practice questions/topic assessment?

Many thanks,

Fragment
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
I read Courant/John and thought it was very good, very well motivated and explained. I do not think it is obsolete, people still read textbooks from 50 years ago, just think of Herstein. Also, Courant/John has nice applications, and remember, when you get to university, you will probably do a physics course too, where Courant and John will be handy.

I'm not sure if the differences in rigour between the books is as big a deal as people make it out to be. I mean, after all, you will study Rudin's PMA or some equivalent book later, right? And that's uber-rigorous.

Oh, as for the problems in Courant and John, there are plenty. None are plug-and-chug. Many challenge you to think harder. But, I have not read either Apostol or Spivak, so I can't compare.
 
  • #38
I found Courant/John to be just as rigorous as Apostol. I can't compare it to Spivak though as I haven't read it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
644
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
7K
Back
Top