Exploring Limits of f(x,y) at the Origin

The algebra that Sammy is suggesting is to find the two values of m where y = mx is tangent to the parabola.
  • #1
STEMucator
Homework Helper
2,076
140

Homework Statement



Let f(x,y) be defined :

f(x,y) = 0 for all (x,y) unless x4 < y < x2
f(x,y) = 1 for all (x,y) where x4 < y < x2

Show that f(x,y) → 0 as (x,y) → 0 on any straight line through (0,0). Determine if lim f(x,y) exists as (x,y) → (0,0).

Homework Equations



Polar co - ordinates maybe?

The Attempt at a Solution



Pretty confused with this one actually. Not sure where to start.

I want to show f(x,y) → 0 as (x,y) → 0 on any straight line through the origin. So would I pick let's say y=x.

Then f(x,x) = I'm not sure, having trouble with the inequalities.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is the following true or false? [itex]x^4 < x < x^2[/itex]
 
  • #3
Zondrina said:

Homework Statement



Let f(x,y) be defined :

f(x,y) = 0 for all (x,y) unless x4 < y < x2
f(x,y) = 1 for all (x,y) where x4 < y < x2

Show that f(x,y) → 0 as (x,y) → 0 on any straight line through (0,0). Determine if lim f(x,y) exists as (x,y) → (0,0).

Homework Equations



Polar co - ordinates maybe?

The Attempt at a Solution



Pretty confused with this one actually. Not sure where to start.

I want to show f(x,y) → 0 as (x,y) → 0 on any straight line through the origin. So would I pick let's say y=x.

Then f(x,x) = I'm not sure, having trouble with the inequalities.

No, you don't want polar coordinates on this. In the xy plane draw your two curves ##y=x^4## and ##y=x^2##. Note in your picture which areas have f(x,y) = 0 and which have f(x,y)=1. Then draw lines ##y=mx## for various ##m##. You should be able to see graphically why f(x,y) → 0 along those lines as (x,y)→ (0,0). Then can you find a path where it doesn't go to zero?
 
  • #4
jbunniii said:
Is the following true or false? [itex]x^4 < x < x^2[/itex]

This is false.

Also @ LC, I used wolfram to plot the curves for me http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+y%3Dx^4+plot+y%3Dx^2

I understand what you mean geometrically, I can't find any line y=mx where the graph does not go through the origin.

Its the analytical portion I'm confused about.
 
  • #5
Also @ LC, I used wolfram to plot the curves for me http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+y%3Dx^4+plot+y%3Dx^2

I understand what you mean geometrically, I can't find any line y=mx where the graph does not go through the origin.

Of course the lines y=mx go through the origin. It is the value of f(x,y) on the line and near (0,0) that you are interested in. Did you observe where in the plane f = 1 and f = 0 on your picture like I suggested?
 
  • #6
Where does the line, y = mx, intersect the parabola, y = x2 ?
 
  • #7
Okay i think i got it.

So any line y=mx we draw will not be fully contained in the region x^4 < y < x^2.

So lim f(x,mx) as (x,y) -> (0,0) = 0 for all (x,y).

Now considering the graph of y=x^3, the path of x^3 is contained within the region x^4 < y < x^2.

So lim f(x,x^3) as (x,y) -> (0,0) = 1 for all (x,y).

Since the two limits are not the same the limit doesn't exist?
 
  • #8
That's the idea. You have a bit of work to do to actually prove it. Do you understand why Sammy asked where y=mx intersects y = x2?
 
  • #9
LCKurtz said:
That's the idea. You have a bit of work to do to actually prove it. Do you understand why Sammy asked where y=mx intersects y = x2?

They only intersect at the origin (depending on m). Not sure why that's relevant though.
 
  • #10
Zondrina said:
They only intersect at the origin (depending on m). Not sure why that's relevant though.
Check your algebra. (The only case of one solution is for m=0.)

[itex]\displaystyle \text{If }x^2=mx\,,\text{ then }\ \ x^2-mx=0 \quad \Rightarrow\quad(x-m)x=0\ .
[/itex]

What are the two solutions to that?
 
  • #11
Zondrina said:
They only intersect at the origin (depending on m). Not sure why that's relevant though.

Think about y = mx for m really small and positive, so the line is very very close to horizontal. That line is going to get in between the two curves and f(x,y) will equal 1 in there and be close to the origin. How do you know it doesn't stay between them as x approaches 0? And that gives a problem with the limit being 0 along all straight lines through the origin. That is the crux of this problem.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Exploring Limits of f(x,y) at the Origin

What is the origin in terms of x and y?

The origin is the point (0,0) on the x-y plane where both the x-coordinate and y-coordinate are equal to zero.

What does it mean to explore limits of f(x,y) at the origin?

Exploring the limits of f(x,y) at the origin means studying the behavior of a function as both x and y approach zero simultaneously. This can help us understand the behavior of the function near the origin and determine if it has a limit at that point.

Why is exploring limits of f(x,y) at the origin important?

Exploring limits at the origin can provide valuable information about the behavior of a function and its continuity at this specific point. It can also help us determine the existence of a limit at the origin, which is a fundamental concept in calculus.

How do you determine the limit of a function at the origin?

To determine the limit of a function at the origin, we can use algebraic techniques such as factoring and simplifying to evaluate the limit. Alternatively, we can use graphical methods by plotting the function and observing its behavior as x and y approach zero.

What is the difference between one-sided and two-sided limits at the origin?

A one-sided limit at the origin means we are only considering the behavior of the function as x and y approach zero from one direction (e.g. from the positive or negative x-axis). In contrast, a two-sided limit means we are considering the behavior of the function as x and y approach zero from all directions.

Back
Top