Exploring Metrics on a Set: Examining Conditions of Equality

In summary, the conversation discusses the definition of a metric on a set S and the five options presented as possible metrics. After ruling out A and C as not meeting the criteria, the correct answer is determined to be E, the square root of d. The conversation also briefly considers why B and D do not meet the criteria, with a demonstration of how they fail the triangle inequality.
  • #1
darkchild
155
0

Homework Statement



For every set S and every metric d on S, which of the following is a metric on S?
A. 4 + d
B. ed + 1
C. d - |d|
D. d2
E. square root of d

Homework Equations


none

The Attempt at a Solution


I've ruled out A. because d(x,x) does not equal 0. I've ruled out C. because it's always equal to 0, even when x does not equal y for d(x,y). The correct answer is E. I can't figure out why B. and D. are not metrics.

For B., ed - 1 is greater than or equal to 0 for all d, is only 0 for d(x,x), d(x,y) = d(y,x), and it's true that d(x,z) is less than or equal to d(x,y)+d(y,z) for all x,y,z in S, and the same is true for answer D...I'm wondering if I'm missing something in the definition of a metric? I know that it is a map to the set of real numbers, so I'm not sure what "every set S" means.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
E is obviously the correct answer because if [tex]\rho =\sqrt{d}[/tex]

[tex]
\begin{array}{rcl}
\rho^{2}(x,y) & \leqslant & \rho^{2}(x,z)+\rho^{2}(z,y) \\
& \leqslant & \rho^{2}(x,z)+\rho^{2}(z,y)+2\rho (x,z)\rho (z,y) \\
& = & (\rho (x,z)+\rho (z,y))^{2}
\end{array}
[/tex]

and so:

[tex]
\rho (x,y)\leqslant \rho (x,z)+\rho (z,y)
[/tex]

For B and D both the first two axioms, clearly hold, so B(x,x)=0 and B(x,y)=B(y,x), likewise for D, so the way that they fail of for the triangle inequality, squaring the triangle inequality for d, shows that the triangle inequality does not hold for D, as for B, the algebra is so horrible that it clearly can't hold.
 

FAQ: Exploring Metrics on a Set: Examining Conditions of Equality

What is the purpose of exploring metrics on a set?

The purpose of exploring metrics on a set is to examine the conditions of equality within the set. This can help us understand the relationships between different elements in the set and how they compare to each other.

What are some common metrics used to measure equality on a set?

Some common metrics used to measure equality on a set include the mean, median, mode, range, and standard deviation. These metrics can provide insights into the distribution and variation of values within the set.

How do metrics help us understand the conditions of equality on a set?

Metrics provide a quantitative way to measure and compare different elements within a set. By examining these metrics, we can identify patterns and trends that can indicate conditions of equality or inequality within the set.

Can metrics be used to identify outliers in a set?

Yes, metrics such as the range and standard deviation can help us identify outliers in a set. Outliers are values that are significantly different from the rest of the data and can affect the overall equality of the set.

How can exploring metrics on a set be beneficial in real-world scenarios?

Exploring metrics on a set can be beneficial in a variety of real-world scenarios, such as analyzing financial data, evaluating performance metrics in a business, or studying trends in scientific data. By examining metrics, we can gain a deeper understanding of the underlying patterns and inequalities within a set.

Back
Top