- #1
boris16
- 46
- 0
hiya
1)
thank you
1)
2)
Why do we call atom containing equal amount of protons and electrons neutral? For example:
We have a neutral atom. But the fact that atom is said to be neutral doesn't mean that objects near this atom don't feel electric forces from protons ( and electrons ) which this atom contains? Aren't in fact electric forces and thus EF caused by protons and electrons in this atom even greater ( at least in some places around this atom ) than if atom lacked electrons and was thus positively charged? If this is indeed the case, why call it neutral? Wouldn't word 'neutral' suggest that this atom no longer creates EF in nearby area?
3)
We have neutral object (object containing same amount of protons and electrons). Are atoms that are building blocks of this neutral object positioned in such a way so that electric forces caused by individual atoms in this object cancel each other out ( and thus object's EF is zero )?
Atomic mass of hydrogen atom is 1 u ( where 'u' is atomic mass unit ).
Hydrogen atom contains one proton.
Mass of single proton is 1 u. Since hydrogen also contains one neutron of same mass as proton, shouldn't hydrogen have mass M
M = mass(proton) + mass(neutron) = 1u + 1u = 2u ?
thank you
Last edited: