Exploring Perplex Numbers: R2 and the Field Axioms

In summary, the conversation discusses defining binary operators on R2 and using them to create a set of perplex numbers. The task at hand is to show that the defined operation is associative and to prove or disprove whether the set (R2, +, \bullet) is a field. The solution involves showing associativity for the operation and disproving the field property of having a multiplicative inverse for all elements, thus proving that (R2, +, \bullet) is not a field.
  • #1
evad1089
19
0

Homework Statement



On R2, define the binary operators
(x,y)+(u,v)=(x+u,y+v)
(x,y)+(u,v)=(xu+yv,xv+yu)
The set R2, along with these definitions of addition and multiplication, for the perplex numbers.
(a) Show that [tex]\cdot[/tex]: R2 [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] R is associative.
(b) Either prove or disprove: The triple (R2,+,[tex]\cdot[/tex]) is a field.

Homework Equations



Definition of a field.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I really have no idea where to start. I have been reading the definition a field over and over and cannot seem to get a grip on the beginning of the proof. I believe on part b I would need to prove/disprove the described field fits the 6 (according to my notes) field axioms. Part a, I am not even sure what it is asking. Just a little help starting is all I should need. My book has nothing on this particular area and my usual resource Wikipedia, has just confused me more (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split-complex_number).

Thank you in advance,
Dave
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For (a), take 3 arbitrary elements from your set R^2 and show that the operation defined is associative. That is, a * (b * c) = (a * b) * c, where a,b,c are members of your set (R^2, and * is the operation defined.)

For (b), to disprove it, you should find one field axiom it does not obey. If you can't find one, then go through all of the axioms.
 
  • #3
So, I have figured out part a. Turns out a was (dot) (colon) R2 -> R2 not (therefore) R2 -> R.

For anyone in the same boat as me here is the solution.

Suppose (a,b), (c,d), (e,f) [tex]\in[/tex] R2, we will show (a,b) [tex]\bullet[/tex] ((c,d)[tex]\bullet[/tex](e,f)) = ((a,b) [tex]\bullet[/tex] (c,d))[tex]\bullet[/tex](e,f).
1. (a,b) [tex]\bullet[/tex] ((c,d)[tex]\bullet[/tex](e,f)) = (a,b) [tex]\bullet[/tex] (ce+df,cf+d3)
2. =(ace+adf+bcf+bde,acf+ade+bce+bdf)
3. ((a,b) [tex]\bullet[/tex] (c,d))[tex]\bullet[/tex](e,f) = (ac+bd,ad+bc)[tex]\bullet[/tex](e,f)
4. =(ace+bdf+adf+bcf,acf+bdf+ade+bce)
5. =(ace+adf+bcf+bde,acf+ade+bce+bdf)
Since line 2 equals line 5, with a little substitution, (a,b) [tex]\bullet[/tex] ((c,d)[tex]\bullet[/tex](e,f)) = ((a,b) [tex]\bullet[/tex] (c,d))[tex]\bullet[/tex](e,f). Therefore, [tex]\bullet[/tex] : R2 -> R2 is associative.
 
  • #4
Now I am still seriously puzzled about b. I am pretty sure that it is not a field, but it seems to fit every axiom. It is associative and commutative for addition and multiplication. And seems to be distributive for multiplication over addition. There appears to be an additive identity of (0,0), a multiplicative identity of (1,0). I see no problem with the field having a additive inverse.

Well this leaves the multiplicative inverse; I believe this might be the key to proving (R2,+,[tex]\bullet[/tex]) is not a field, but as to proving this idea, I am at a loss.
 
  • #5
evad1089 said:

Homework Statement



On R2, define the binary operators
(x,y)+(u,v)=(x+u,y+v)
(x,y)+(u,v)=(xu+yv,xv+yu)
Do you have a typo in the second line above? Otherwise you have defined addition in two ways.
evad1089 said:
The set R2, along with these definitions of addition and multiplication, for the perplex numbers.
(a) Show that [tex]\cdot[/tex]: R2 [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] R is associative.
(b) Either prove or disprove: The triple (R2,+,[tex]\cdot[/tex]) is a field.

Homework Equations



Definition of a field.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I really have no idea where to start. I have been reading the definition a field over and over and cannot seem to get a grip on the beginning of the proof. I believe on part b I would need to prove/disprove the described field fits the 6 (according to my notes) field axioms. Part a, I am not even sure what it is asking. Just a little help starting is all I should need. My book has nothing on this particular area and my usual resource Wikipedia, has just confused me more (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split-complex_number).

Thank you in advance,
Dave
 
  • #6
Yes. The second one is supposed to be (x,y)[tex]\bullet[/tex](u,v)=(xu+yv,xv+yu).
 
  • #7
Well I figured out b.

Since one of the requirements of a field is that the multiplicative inverse is defined for all elements of the field. We can prove the triple (R2,+,[tex]\bullet[/tex]) is not a field. As a side note the multiplicative identity of this non field is (1,0).

Suppose (3,3)[tex]\in[/tex]R2 has a multiplicative inverse, (a,b). Then (3,3)[tex]\bullet[/tex](a,b)=(1,0). Evaluating the left side we obtain, (3a+3b,3b+3a)=(1,0). Since 3a+3b=3b+3a, but 1[tex]\neq[/tex]0, this is a contradiction. Therefore (3,3)[tex]\in[/tex]R2 does not have a multiplicative inverse. Since one of the reuirements of a field is the multiplicative inverse is defined for all members of the field, the triple (R2,+,[tex]\bullet[/tex]) is not a field.

Uhhhh... well I guess good luck to the next person. Hope this helps.
 

FAQ: Exploring Perplex Numbers: R2 and the Field Axioms

What are perplex numbers?

Perplex numbers, also known as split-complex numbers, are a type of number system that extends the set of real numbers. They are written in the form a + bj, where a and b are real numbers and j is a new imaginary unit that follows the rule j^2 = 1.

How do perplex numbers differ from complex numbers?

Perplex numbers are similar to complex numbers in that they both have real and imaginary components. However, in perplex numbers, the imaginary unit j has a different rule (j^2 = 1) compared to the imaginary unit i in complex numbers (i^2 = -1).

What is R2 in the context of perplex numbers?

R2 refers to the two-dimensional vector space that contains perplex numbers. It can also be thought of as the Cartesian plane, where the x-axis represents the real component and the y-axis represents the imaginary component of perplex numbers.

What are the field axioms and how are they related to perplex numbers?

The field axioms are a set of mathematical rules that define the properties of a field, which is a set of numbers that follows certain operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division). Perplex numbers, along with real and complex numbers, satisfy all of the field axioms and can therefore be considered a field.

How can perplex numbers be used in real-world applications?

Perplex numbers have applications in engineering, physics, and computer graphics. They can be used to model and solve problems involving rotation and reflection in two-dimensional space. They are also useful in electrical engineering, where they can represent the impedance of a circuit.

Similar threads

Back
Top