Exploring Planck 2015 Results on Power Law Potential Models

In summary, the conversation discusses the Planck 2015 results and their implications for different inflationary potential shapes. The observed E-mode spectrum is not a good measure of tensor perturbations, while the B-mode spectrum is a direct measurement. The values of the B mode for different potential shapes are considered "strongly disfavored" or "moderately disfavored". The paper shows that the predicted magnitudes of the tensor perturbations from quadratic potentials are too small to be detected at this time.
  • #1
JD_PM
1,131
158
TL;DR Summary
I am trying to understand why the simple inflationary model with potential ##V(\phi) \propto \phi^2## is disfavored compared to models predicting a smaller tensor-to-scalar ratio.
I am reading Planck 2015 results. In particular, I focused on "Power law potentials" subsection.

The issues I have are

1. I do not understand why the validity of the model can be determined by the value of the ##B## mode.
2. Why the ##B## mode values ##\ln B = −11.6## and ##\ln B = −23.3## for the cubic and quartic potentials , respectively, are regarded as "strongly disfavored" and ##\ln B = −4.7## for the quadratic potential as "moderately disfavored"? What I mean is: what is the threshold value at which we can consider the potential as favored and why?

Thank you! :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Different inflationary potential shapes predict different relationships between the tensor perturbations and scalar perturbations. The scalar perturbations contribute primarily to the temperature variations across the sky. The tensor perturbations contribute primarily to the polarization of the observed CMB.

The observed E-mode spectrum is dominated by effects after inflation such as structure formation, so it isn't a very good measure of the tensor perturbations.

The large-scale B-mode spectrum is mostly independent of late-time effects, so it's a nearly direct measurement of the tensor perturbations produced during inflation. So far all we've been able to say is that the magnitude of these perturbations is too small to be detected (yet).

Quadratic potentials for inflation typically predict that we would have detected the tensor perturbations by now. This is shown in Fig. 12 in that paper.
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM

FAQ: Exploring Planck 2015 Results on Power Law Potential Models

What are the main findings of the Planck 2015 results on power law potential models?

The main findings of the Planck 2015 results on power law potential models are that these models provide a good fit to the observed data, with the best-fit values for the parameters being consistent with the predictions of inflationary models. Additionally, the results also support the idea that the universe underwent a period of rapid expansion in its early stages.

How does the power law potential model explain the expansion of the universe?

The power law potential model explains the expansion of the universe by positing that the energy density of the universe is dominated by a scalar field, which drives the accelerated expansion. This scalar field has a power law potential, meaning its energy density decreases as the universe expands, resulting in the observed acceleration.

What is the significance of the Planck 2015 results on power law potential models for our understanding of the early universe?

The significance of the Planck 2015 results on power law potential models for our understanding of the early universe is that they provide strong evidence for the inflationary theory, which explains the rapid expansion of the universe in its early stages. This supports the idea that the universe underwent a period of inflation, which is crucial for explaining the large-scale structure of the universe and other observed phenomena.

How do the Planck 2015 results on power law potential models impact our current understanding of dark energy?

The Planck 2015 results on power law potential models have a significant impact on our current understanding of dark energy. They provide evidence that the accelerated expansion of the universe can be explained by a scalar field, rather than invoking the existence of a mysterious form of energy. This challenges our current understanding of dark energy and opens up new avenues for further research.

What are the implications of the Planck 2015 results on power law potential models for future research in cosmology?

The implications of the Planck 2015 results on power law potential models for future research in cosmology are significant. They provide a strong foundation for further investigations into the early universe, inflation, and the nature of dark energy. The results also highlight the importance of continued advancements in technology and data analysis techniques to further our understanding of the universe and its origins.

Similar threads

Back
Top